Answer:
a = 40
b = 29
Explanation:
Give a place holder for the numbers that we don't know.
Lets call the two numbers a and b.
From the given info, we can write an expression and solve it:
"one number is 11 more than another number"
a = 11 + b
from this, we know that a > b.
''three times the larger number exceeds four times the smaller number by 4"
3a = 4b + 4
Now we have 2 equations, we can use them to solve using whatever method you want.
a = 11 + b
3a = 4b + 4
I will be using matrices RREF to solve for this.
a - b = 11
3a - 4b = 4
a = 40
b = 29
Answer:
Map and avoid high-risk zones.
Build hazard-resistant structures and houses.
Protect and develop hazard buffers (forests, reefs, etc.)
Develop culture of prevention and resilience.
Improve early warning and response systems.
Build institutions, and development policies and plans.
Explanation:
Answer:
The original length of the specimen 
Explanation:
Original diameter 
= 30 mm
Final diameter 
= 30.04 mm
Change in diameter Δd = 0.04 mm
Final length 
= 105.20 mm
Elastic modulus E = 65.5 G pa = 65.5 × 
M pa
Shear modulus G = 25.4 G pa = 25.4 × M pa
We know that the relation between the shear modulus & elastic modulus is given by
This is the value of possion's ratio.
We know that the possion's ratio is given by
0.00476
Final length 
= 105.2 m
Original length
This is the original length of the specimen.
Answer:
Explanation:
For automobile emission, a uniform standard is preferred, because no unnecessary advantage is given by it to any company that is located in particular states where the regional standards are less severe.
Since pollution has its impact across the states and in the whole of the USA, then there should be uniform standards across all the states. It will also invalidate the impact of regional standards as a factor in the selection of plant locations for the automobile company. It means that a state offering less valid emission standards, will attract more companies to herself and it will be against the other states who care more about the natural environment. It can make more states to opt for the permissive emission standards, that will be more harmful to the USA as a country, than the good. So, a uniform standard is preferred to eliminate it as a factor in plant location decisions.
Yes, uniform standards are beneficial to everyone, because it will bring effective control upon the pollution level because there will be no state where the culprit firm can hide. Besides, it is more effective as efforts done towards environment conservation.
