Answer:
Larger tubines generate more electricity.
Explanation:
Larger blades allow the turbine to capture more of the kinetic energy of the wind by moving more air through the rotors. However, larger blades require more space and higher wind speeds to operate. This distance is necessary to avoid interference between turbines, which decreases the power output.
The 4 m board's center of mass is 2 m so the pivot point is somewhere between Tasha and 2 m (if you draw a picture it's going to make this clearer)
The mass of Tasha * her distance from the pivot point = the board's mass * distance from the pivot point.
<span> Let d1 be the distance Tasha is from the pivot point. The board's center of mass from the pivot point is 2 m - d1
</span><span> 20 kg * d1 = 10 kg * (2m - d1)
</span><span> Solve for d1, you should get 2/3 of a m for the distance Tasha is from the pivot or support point. The center of mass for the board is 1 1/3 m from the support point. </span>
Answer:
The Big Crunch hypothesis is a symmetric view of the ultimate fate of the universe. Just as the Big Bang started as a cosmological expansion, this theory assumes that the average density of the universe will be enough to stop its expansion and begin contracting.
Explanation:
hope it helps
It is Real,Virtual,The Same Size, Inverted
Answer:
- <u><em>Option A) A gas was produced.</em></u>
Explanation:
Indeed, the production of a gas is an indication that a new substance was produced as result of the reaction of the matter that constitutes the antiacid tablet and the distilled water.
A chemical reaction is a change that yields the formation of new substances (products), due to the rearrangements of the atoms of the reactants.
In a very simple form, you can represent a chemical reaction by the general equation:
Which means that some elements or compounds, those in the reactant side of the equation, undergo a change in which some chemical bonds are broken, the atoms separate from the original substances and combine into a new arrangement in which they form one or more different substances (products).
The option B), that the table dissapeared is not a clear evidence of a chemical change because it could have been dissolved, which is a physical change.
Also, the option C), that there was a color change, cannot be cited as an evidence of a chemical reaction, since the color is a physical property.
As for the option D, that there was a change in mass, is not a viable option, since mass cannot change either with a chemical or physical change.
