All categories

2 years ago

Eva Baul throws a ball upward at 23.4 m/s

Physics

1 answer:

Mice21 [21]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

28 m

Explanation:

v₀ = 23.4 m/s, g = -9.8 m/s²

at the peak v = 0

find h

v² - v₀² = 2gh

0 - 23.4² = 2(-9.8)h = -19.6 h

so h = 28 m

You might be interested in

What molecular geometry would be expected for f2 and hf?

Kaylis [27]

The molecular geometry of both F2 and HF is linear.

There are only two atoms which are covalently bonded and thus, the bonding scheme with the atoms looks like this;

F --- F

H---F

So, both are linear.

4 0

2 years ago

DUE TODAY PLEASE HELP.....WILL GIVE BRANIST!!!!!!!

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

girl how someone supposed to help you with that?!

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Now our wavelength is getting longer

aleksley [76]

This makes frequency lower as well as the pitch we hear.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A light source of wavelength λ illuminates a metal with a work function (a.k.a., binding energy) of BE=2.00 eV and ejects electr

slega [8]

<h2>Answer: 1.011 eV</h2>

Explanation:

The described situation is the photoelectric effect, which consists of the emission of electrons (electric current) that occurs when light falls on a metal surface under certain conditions.

If we consider the light as a stream of photons and each of them has energy, this energy is able to pull an electron out of the crystalline lattice of the metal and communicate, in addition, a <u>kinetic energy. </u>

This is what Einstein proposed:

Light behaves like a stream of particles called photons with an energy $E$ :

$E=h.f$ (1)

So, the energy $E$ of the incident photon must be equal to the sum of the Work function $\Phi$ of the metal and the kinetic energy $K$ of the photoelectron:

$E=\Phi+K$ (2)

Where $\Phi$ is the <u>minimum amount of energy required to induce the photoemission of electrons from the surface of a metal, and </u><u>its value depends on the metal. </u>

In this case $\Phi=2eV$ and $K_{1}=4eV$

So, for the first light source of wavelength $\lambda_{1}$ , and applying equation (2) we have:

$E_{1}=2eV+4eV$ (3)

$E_{1}=6eV$ (4)

Now, substituting (1) in (4):

$h.f=6eV$ (5)

Where:

$h=4.136(10)^{-15}eV.s$ is the Planck constant

$f$ is the frequency

Now, the <u>frequency has an inverse relation with the wavelength </u>

$\lambda_{1}$ :

$f=\frac{c}{\lambda_{1}}$ (6)

Where $c=3(10)^{8}m/s$ is the speed of light in vacuum

Substituting (6) in (5):

$\frac{hc}{\lambda_{1}}=6eV$ (7)

Then finding $\lambda_{1}$ :

$\lambda_{1}=\frac{hc}{6eV }$ (8)

$\lambda_{1}=\frac{(4.136(10)^{-15} eV.s)(3(10)^{8}m/s)}{6eV}$

We obtain the wavelength of the first light suorce $\lambda_{1}$ :

$\lambda_{1}=2.06(10)^{-7}m$ (9)

Now, we are told the second light source $\lambda_{2}$ has the double the wavelength of the first:

$\lambda_{2}=2\lambda_{1}=(2)(2.06(10)^{-7}m)$ (10)

Then: $\lambda_{2}=4.12(10)^{-7}m$ (11)

Knowing this value we can find $E_{2}$ :

$E_{2}=\frac{hc}{\lambda_{2}}$ (12)

$E_{2}=\frac{(4.136(10)^{-15} eV.s)(3(10)^{8}m/s)}{4.12(10)^{-7}m}$ (12)

$E_{2}=3.011eV$ (13)

Knowing the value of $E_{2}$ and $\lambda_{2}$ , and knowing we are working with the same work function, we can finally find the maximum kinetic energy $K_{2}$ for this wavelength: