1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alisiya [41]
2 years ago
12

Acar start from rest and go with velocity of 4m/s for 4second what is acceleration of car​

Physics
2 answers:
lesya [120]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1m/s

Explanation:

Given

initial velocity(u)=0

final velocity(v)=4m/s

timetaken (t)=4

Aceleration(a)=v-u÷t

now

=4-0÷4

=1m/s

aleksklad [387]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1 m/s^2

Explanation:

The formula for accleration is a=Δv/Δt

where, Δv = final velocity - initial velocity = 4 - 0 = 4

initial velocity = 0 since the car starts form rest and final velovity is 4 as the car goes from rest till 4 m/s

Δt = 4 since the car takes 4 seconds to reach a velocity of 4m/s

Hence, a = 4 m/s / 4 s = 1 m/s^2

You might be interested in
A motorcycle is speeding along at a velocity of120kph.Then, it changes to a velocity of 150 kph for 2 minutes.What is the motorc
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

a=v-u/t

a=acceleration

v=final velocity

u=initial velocity

t=tme taken

we need to convert from kph to ms⁻¹

v= 150*1000/60*60= 41.67ms⁻¹

u= 120*1000/60*60= 33.33ms⁻¹

t= 2*60= 120s

a=41.67-33.33/120

a=8.34/120

a=0.0694ms⁻²

8 0
3 years ago
The law of universal gravitation states that a gravitational force exists between all objects in the universe. This force is dir
Ber [7]

Answer: D. it has been demonstrated to be without exception under certain stated conditions.

Explanation:

A <u>Law</u> is an affirmation (something established) based on repeated long-term observation of a phenomenon that has been studied and verified.  

That is: A law is present in all known theories and therefore is considered universal. In addition, a law can not be refuted, nor changed, because its precepts have been proven through various studies.  

<u>Unlike theory</u>, which is the set of rules and principles that describe and explain a particular phenomenon and <u>is subject to changes as new evidence emerges that gives meaning to it.  </u>

Then, based on what is explained above, the law of universal gravitation is a statement that exists because it was rigorously tested and verified, therefore it can not be refuted.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of differentiation geology?
UkoKoshka [18]
Any process in which a mixture of materials separates out partially
5 0
3 years ago
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Given a sphere with radius r, find the height of a pyramid of minimum volume whose base is a square and whose base and triangula
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

The Height of a pyramid is 4r.

Explanation:

Explanation is in the following attachments

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A force of 1500 pounds drags a truck 40 feet in 20 seconds. How much work is accomplished? How much power was required?
    11·2 answers
  • Héłp mê ................???.?
    8·2 answers
  • Where is each subatomic particle is found in an atom
    6·1 answer
  • What is the current in a series circuit that has two resistors (4.0 ohms and 7.5 ohms) and a power source of 9.0 volts?
    5·2 answers
  • One gram of salt in 100 liters of water could be considered a _______________________ solution.
    15·2 answers
  • A concave lens always creats an image that is smaller and upright
    10·1 answer
  • A force of 8800 N is exerted on a piston that has an area of 0.010 m^2. What is the force exerted by a second piston that has an
    9·2 answers
  • Light year is a unit of?
    8·1 answer
  • What r they??????????????????
    7·1 answer
  • A gas-filled balloon is submerged in a fluid. As a result, the balloon is subject to inward forces from all sides. How does the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!