The answer to this question is c
"lets exercise and eat healthy foods together"<span />
The answer is false, your welcome.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:
The magnitude of the resultant decreases from A+B to A-B
Explanation:
The magnitude of the resultant of two vectors is given by
where
A is the magnitude of the first vector
B is the magnitude of the second vector
is the angle between the directions of the two vectors
In the formula, A and B are constant, so the behaviour depends only on the function 
. The value of are:
- 1 (maximum) when the angle is 0, so the magnitude of the resultant in this case is
- then it decreases, until it becomes 0 when the angle is 90 degrees, where the magnitude of the resultant is
- then it becomes negative, and continues to decrease, until it reaches a value of -1 when the angle is 180 degrees, and the magnitude of the resultant is
