Answer:
A
Explanation:
If its going at a constant speed it will not accelarate wich means to speed up.
A source of error is any factor that may affect the outcome of an experiment. There are countless conceivable sources of error in any experiment; you want to focus on the factors that matter most. Identify each source of error specifically and then explain how that source of error would have affected the results. Keep in mind that an "error" to a scientist does not mean "mistake"; it more closely means "uncertainty".
Many students are tempted to say "human error", but this term is vague and lazy; any decent teacher will not accept it. Instead, think about specific things that happened during the lab exercise where the end results may have been affected.
To give an example one might find in a bio lab: perhaps a water bath's temperature was not monitored very carefully and you found that an enzyme's activity was greater than you expected. In that case, you could write something like,
"The temperature of the water bath during this exercise was not monitored carefully. It is possible that it was warmer or cooler than intended, and this would have affected the enzyme activity accordingly. The fact that our enzyme activity was found to be higher than expected leads me to believe that perhaps the water bath was too warm."
Answer:
Here's what I find
Explanation:
Heisenberg observed that if we want to locate a moving electron, we must bounce photons off it.
However, this makes it recoil. By the time the photon returns to our eye, the electron will no longer be in the same place.
He concluded that there is a limit to the precision with which we can simultaneously measure the position and speed (momentum) of a particle.
The more precisely we know the electron's speed, the less precisely we know its position and vice versa.
The uncertainty in the product of the two values cannot be less than a fixed small number.
Claim: Earth's atmospheric CO2 levels were measured over the past 1000 years and correlated with average world temperatures. The data demostrate that Earth's temperature did not change during the period CO2 levels were steady. But the past 100 years show a dramatic rise in CO2 levels, with a corresponding rise in world temperatures. The CO2 rise can be traced back to the start of the industrial revolution, when machines began doing much of the work. These machine burn fossil fuels and the increased CO2 levels have led to a dramatic rise in world temperatures. The data clearly show the importance of reducing fossil fuel useage, as well as other CO2 emitters. A world of incresing temperatures will lead to greater natural disasters, such as storms, flooding, hurricanes, and drought - all of which upset the ecological balance of the planet.
Answer:
they are equal.
Explanation:
1 mol = 6.022 × 10^23 (Avogadro's constant), which is the number of atoms in 1 mol of any element. Doesn't matter what their atomic mass is, although, of course, 1 mol of carbon weighs less than 1 mol of calcium, but its because their mass is different, but the point is, in 1 mol of any element there is 6.03*10^23 atoms
This is like saying, what weighs more, 10 kg of feathers or 10 kg of metal
