The strength of the electric field 0.5 m from a 6 µc charge is n/c. (use k = 8.99 × 109 n•meters squared per coulomb squared and
1 answer:
The strength of the electric field will be 215760 NC⁻¹. The concept of the electric field strength is used in the problem.
<h3>What is electric file strength?</h3>The electric field strength is defined as the ratio of electric force and charge. Its unit is NC⁻¹.
The given data in the problem is;
E is the Electric Field Strength
k is the Colomb's constant = 8.99 x 10⁹ N.m²/C²
q is the magnitude of charge = 6 μC = 6 x 10⁻⁶ C
r is the distance = 0.5 m
The electric field strength is given by the formula;
Hence the strength of the electric field will be 215760 NC⁻¹.
To learn more about the electric field strength refer to the link;
You might be interested in
Answer:
Option D (On the...............dominate) would be the right approach.
Explanation:
The Gravitational constant (G) will be:
=
The Coulomb's law constant (K) will be:
=
- Throughout particular, these have been determined that among 2 substances with almost the similar form of charge, the combination of electromagnetic as well as the force does seem to be usually the following:
⇒
- By that same argument, the electrostatic force including its planet's atmosphere would have strongly influenced the effect, as well as maybe the planet's atmosphere, would have crashed, or perhaps the earth would have shifted at a much longer exposure from one another and.
- Throughout particular, astronomical distance statutory framework that gravity seems to be predominant, whereas electrostatic forces have been generally ignored. It is quite since there are so many categories of allegations throughout the planet's atmosphere that balance out someone else's effects, there's only yet another form of momentum, because although the forces are still cumulative, as well as therefore offering to help everything hold to the universe, encouraging the universe just to rotate across the sun.
The latter three choices aren't connected to either the situation mentioned in the clarification segment elsewhere here.