Answer: The theory of Plate Tectonics is now widely accepted because there is sufficient proof to support it, and it is an important aspect of geology, oceanography, geophysics and even paleontology.
Explanation: In places where a plate faced resistance to its movement, it would fold upward and create mountains. Hope this helped! :)
Well, first of all, there's no such thing as "fully charged" for a capacitor.
A capacitor has a "maximum working voltage", because of mechanical
or chemical reasons, just like a car has a maximum safe speed. But
anywhere below that, cars and capacitors do their jobs just fine, without
any risk of failing.
So we have a capacitor that has some charge on it, and therefore some
voltage across it. From the list of choices above . . .
<span>-- Both plates have the same amount of charge.
Yes. And both plates have opposite TYPES of charge.
One plate is loaded with electrons and is negatively charged.
The other plate is missing electrons and is positively charged.
-- There is a potential difference between the plates.
Yes. That's the "voltage" mentioned earlier.
It's a measure of how badly the extra electrons want to jump
from the negative plate to the positive plate.
-- Electric potential energy is stored.
Yes. It's the energy that had to be put into the capacitor
to move electrons away from one plate and cram them
onto the other plate.
</span>
<span>superconductors, conductors, semiconductors, insulators </span>
Answer:
12 Neutrons
Explanation:
So the mass of sodium is 22.990. You round it up to get 23(as stated in the problem). So, <em>what exactly is atomic mass?</em>
Atomic Mass is the total amount of neutrons and protons added up to form a total mass. So when you subtract 23-11 you get 12 Neutrons.
<u>Tip: </u>Don't know if you need this but-
The neutrons and protons are typically close in number (unless it's an isotope). So say that you subtract and the numbers of protons and neutrons aren't close at all. Well if that's the case, it's probably wrong.
hope this helps!!
Answer: the correct one is E .systems; for example, hurricanes could be prevented from forming by artificial "reefs" of precisely shaped marine platforms
Explanation:
(A) The portion after the semi-colon (for instance, ... platforms) is not a complete sentence.
(B) The portion after the semi-colon (for example, ... forming) is not a complete sentence.
(C) Which ... "reefs" ... prevent forming is unidiomatic; from is needed between prevent and forming. Prevent appears in the present tense, illogically implying that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—already prevent the formation of hurricanes.
(D) The construction such as artificial "reefs" illogically implies that artificial reefs are weather systems. Additionally, the use of can in the present tense (as opposed to could) illogically implies that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—do already exist.
(E) CORRECT. The semicolon is properly used to separate two complete sentences. Could is correctly used to describe a hypothetical consequence.
