1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
6

B) A 120.0 g sample of ice at -10.0°C has placed on a heat source. How much energy must be

Chemistry
1 answer:
nikklg [1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Q = 27060 j

Explanation:

Given data:

Mass of sample = 120 g

Initial temperature = -10.0 °C

Final temperature = 100 °C

Heat added = ?

Solution:

Formula:

Q = m.c. ΔT

Q = amount of heat absorbed or released

m = mass of given substance

c = specific heat capacity of substance

ΔT = change in temperature

ΔT = T₂ - T₁

ΔT = 100- (-10)

ΔT = 110°C

Q = m.c. ΔT

Q = 120 g × 2.05 g/J.°C × 110°C

Q = 27060 j

You might be interested in
1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6 how many unpaired electrons are in the atom represented by the electron configuration above?
Sedbober [7]
It's a combination of factors:
Less electrons paired in the same orbital
More electrons with parallel spins in separate orbitals
Pertinent valence orbitals NOT close enough in energy for electron pairing to be stabilized enough by large orbital size
DISCLAIMER: Long answer, but it's a complicated issue, so... :)
A lot of people want to say that it's because a "half-filled subshell" increases stability, which is a reason, but not necessarily the only reason. However, for chromium, it's the significant reason.
It's also worth mentioning that these reasons are after-the-fact; chromium doesn't know the reasons we come up with; the reasons just have to be, well, reasonable.
The reasons I can think of are:
Minimization of coulombic repulsion energy
Maximization of exchange energy
Lack of significant reduction of pairing energy overall in comparison to an atom with larger occupied orbitals
COULOMBIC REPULSION ENERGY
Coulombic repulsion energy is the increased energy due to opposite-spin electron pairing, in a context where there are only two electrons of nearly-degenerate energies.
So, for example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is higher in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier on us, we can crudely "measure" the repulsion energy with the symbol
Π
c
. We'd just say that for every electron pair in the same orbital, it adds one
Π
c
unit of destabilization.
When you have something like this with parallel electron spins...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
It becomes important to incorporate the exchange energy.
EXCHANGE ENERGY
Exchange energy is the reduction in energy due to the number of parallel-spin electron pairs in different orbitals.
It's a quantum mechanical argument where the parallel-spin electrons can exchange with each other due to their indistinguishability (you can't tell for sure if it's electron 1 that's in orbital 1, or electron 2 that's in orbital 1, etc), reducing the energy of the configuration.
For example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is lower in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier for us, a crude way to "measure" exchange energy is to say that it's equal to
Π
e
for each pair that can exchange.
So for the first configuration above, it would be stabilized by
Π
e
(
1
↔
2
), but the second configuration would have a
0
Π
e
stabilization (opposite spins; can't exchange).
PAIRING ENERGY
Pairing energy is just the combination of both the repulsion and exchange energy. We call it
Π
, so:
Π
=
Π
c
+
Π
e

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Basically, the pairing energy is:
higher when repulsion energy is high (i.e. many electrons paired), meaning pairing is unfavorable
lower when exchange energy is high (i.e. many electrons parallel and unpaired), meaning pairing is favorable
So, when it comes to putting it together for chromium... (
4
s
and
3
d
orbitals)
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
compared to
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
is more stable.
For simplicity, if we assume the
4
s
and
3
d
electrons aren't close enough in energy to be considered "nearly-degenerate":
The first configuration has
Π
=
10
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
1
↔
5
,
2
↔
3
,

2
↔
4
,
2
↔
5
,
3
↔
4
,
3
↔
5
,
4
↔
5
)
The second configuration has
Π
=
Π
c
+
6
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
2
↔
3
,
2
↔
4
,
3
↔
4
)
Technically, they are about
3.29 eV
apart (Appendix B.9), which means it takes about
3.29 V
to transfer a single electron from the
3
d
up to the
4
s
.
We could also say that since the
3
d
orbitals are lower in energy, transferring one electron to a lower-energy orbital is helpful anyways from a less quantitative perspective.
COMPLICATIONS DUE TO ORBITAL SIZE
Note that for example,
W
has a configuration of
[
X
e
]
5
d
4
6
s
2
, which seems to contradict the reasoning we had for
Cr
, since the pairing occurred in the higher-energy orbital.
But, we should also recognize that
5
d
orbitals are larger than
3
d
orbitals, which means the electron density can be more spread out for
W
than for
Cr
, thus reducing the pairing energy
Π
.
That is,
Π
W
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to prepare very dilute solutions, a lab technician chooses to perform a series of dilutions instead of measuring a very
laiz [17]

Answerit is a

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Identify the arrows that represent the process of cooling.<br> gas<br> liquid
olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

Liquid - Gas is Evaporation & Gas - Cooling is condensation

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
According to the kinetic molecular theory particles of matter
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

The kinetic molecular theory of matter states that: Matter is made up of particles that are constantly moving. ... Molecules in the solid phase have the least amount of energy, while gas particles have the greatest amount of energy. The temperature of a substance is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the particles.

Explanation:

give me brainliest please

4 0
3 years ago
the reaction of aluminum with chlorine gas is shown 2Al + 3Cl2 -&gt; 2AlCl3 based on this equation how many molecules of chlorin
Vanyuwa [196]

45 molecules of chlorine gas (Cl₂) are needed to react with 30 atoms of aluminum (Al)

The balanced equation for the reaction is given below:

2Al + 3Cl₂ —> 2AlCl₃

From the balanced equation above,

2 atoms of Al required 3 molecules of Cl₂.

With the above information, we can determine the number of molecules of Cl₂ needed to react with 30 atoms of Al. This can be obtained as follow:

From the balanced equation above,

2 atoms of Al required 3 molecules of Cl₂.

Therefore,

30 atoms of Al will require = \frac{30 * 3}{2}\\ = 45 molecules of Cl₂.

Thus, 45 molecules of chlorine gas (Cl₂) are needed to react with 30 atoms of aluminum (Al)

Learn more: brainly.com/question/24918379

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Elements that easily give up electrons are called ? a metals b metalloids c nonmetals d noble gasses
    7·2 answers
  • 2. Calculate the molarity of a solution if there are 1.5 mol of NaCl in 2.3 L of solution.
    8·1 answer
  • Atmospheric pressure arises due to the force exerted by the air above the Earth. At higher altitudes, the mass of the air above
    15·1 answer
  • What structure in a bacterial cell controls which substances enter and leave the cell?
    12·1 answer
  • How many grams of O2 are required to produce 5 mol CO2
    6·1 answer
  • Organize the following metals from least metallic to most metallic :barium,zinc,iron, and strontium
    5·1 answer
  • Dissolving 4.02 g of CaCl2 in enough water to make 349 mL of solution causes the temperature of the solution to increase by 3.91
    8·1 answer
  • Why is it important to pasteurize certain liquids?
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    11·2 answers
  • Write the formula for zinc dichromate
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!