The best use of an atomic model to explain the charge of the particles in Thomson's beams is:
<u>An atom's smaller negative particles are at a distance from the central positive particles, so the negative particles are easier to remove.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
In Thomson's model, an atom comprises of electrons that are surrounded by a group of positive particles to equal the electron's negative particles, like negatively charged “plums” that are surrounded by positively charged “pudding”.
Atoms are composed of a nucleus that consists of protons and neutrons . Electron was discovered by Sir J.J.Thomson. Atoms are neutral overall, therefore in Thomson’s ‘plum pudding model’:
-
atoms are spheres of positive charge
- electrons are dotted around inside
Thomson's conclusions made him to propose the Rutherford model of the atom where the atom had a concentrated nucleus of positive charge and also large mass.
Answer:
move the decimal 6 places to the left.
Explanation:
um I assume you meant to say area m^3
Answer:
A. Their same forces repel each other, and their opposite forces attract each other.
Explanation:
As we know by the property of electric charge that similar charges repel each other and opposite charges attracts each other
So here we have similar situation in magnets also
Two similar poles or like poles of magnet i.e. North - North poles or South - South poles always repel each other
And also we can see that opposite poles of magnet each other i.e. North pole and south pole always attract each other.
SO here correct answer is
A. Their same forces repel each other, and their opposite forces attract each other.
Where Gravity rely's on only mass and distance and nothing else, so the weight on the planets will vary like you have stated. However Mars is smaller than Mercury, so the weight on Mars will be less, and the weight on Mercury will be more. Think this way.
More Mass = More Gravity = More Weight
Less Mass = Less Gravity = Less Weight
