Liz puts a 1 kg weight and a 10 kg on identical sleds. She then applies a 10N force to each sled. Which does not explain why the
smaller weight accelerate faster?
A) The larger mass spends more force overcoming inertia.
B) The smaller weight exerts less frictional force to overcome.
C) The acceleration depends directly on the mass of the object.
D) The motion of the sled relates to action of unbalanced forces.
A) The larger mass spends more force overcoming inertia.
B) The smaller weight exerts less frictional force to overcome.
C) The acceleration depends directly on the mass of the object.
D) The motion of the sled relates to action of unbalanced forces.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
If we want the object to continue to move at constant speed, it means that the resultant of the forces acting on the object must be zero. So far, we have:
- force F1 with direction north, of 10 N
- force F2 with direction west, of 10 N
The third force must balance them, in order to have a net force of zero on the object.
The resultant of the two forces F1 and F2 is
with direction at
north-west. This means that F3 must be equal and opposite to this force: so, F3 must have magnitude 14.1 N and its direction should be 
south-east.
- force F1 with direction north, of 10 N
- force F2 with direction west, of 10 N
The third force must balance them, in order to have a net force of zero on the object.
The resultant of the two forces F1 and F2 is
with direction at
Answer:
inelastic, since the girl moves in the same direction as the thrown ball
Explanation:
yess this ok
UwU
