1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
laila [671]
3 years ago
9

How much energy does it take to melt a 16.87 g ice cube? ΔHfus = 6.02 kJ/mol How much energy does it take to melt a 16.87 g ice

cube? = 6.02 kJ/mol 108 kJ 102 kJ 5.64 kJ 936 J none of the above
Physics
1 answer:
Vilka [71]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

How much energy does it take to melt a 16.87 g ice cube? ΔHfus = 6.02 kJ/mol How much energy does it take to melt a 16.87 g ice cube? = 6.02 kJ/mol

A. 108 kJ

B. 102 kJ

C. 5.64 kJ

D. 936 kJ

E. none of the above

<em>5.64 kJ</em>

Explanation:

The Heat of fusion is the heat energy required to dissolve a given mass of ice at melting point.

<h3>Step by Step Calculation</h3>

The heat energy required to dissolve ice can be calculated using the expression below;

Q = ΔH_{f} x m ...............................................1

where Q is the heat energy required;

           ΔH_{f}  is the heat of fusion for ice;

           m is the mole

All the parameters above are provided in the question except m, so to get m we use the molar mass of water (also for ice) which is 18.01528 g/mol .

<em>This means that 18.01528 g of ice is contained in one mole, therefore the mole for 16.87 g of ice is given as;</em>

m = \frac{16.87g}{18.015g/mol}

m = 0.9364 mole of ices

Now the parameters are complete, we are given;

ΔH_{f}  = 6.02 kJ/mol

m = 0.9364 mol

Q =?

Substituting into equation 1, we have

Q =  6.02 kJ/mol x 0.9364 mol

Q = 5.64 kJ

<em>Therefore, the energy required to melt 16.87 g of ice is 5.64 kJ</em>

You might be interested in
URGENT!!!!!!!<br><br> PLEASE HELP WITH THIS PHYSICS PROBLEM
Levart [38]

Explanation:

Let

x_1 = distance traveled while accelerating

x_2 = distance traveled while decelerating

The distance traveled while accelerating is given by

x_1 = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 = \frac{1}{2}at^2

\:\:\:\:\:= \frac{1}{2}(2.5\:\text{m/s}^2)(30\:\text{s})^2

\:\:\:\:\:= 1125\:\text{m}

We need the velocity of the rocket after 30 seconds and we can calculate it as follows:

v = at = (2.5\:\text{m/s}^2)(30\:\text{s}) = 75\:\text{m/s}

This will be the initial velocity when start calculating for the distance it traveled while decelerating.

v^2 = v_0^2 + 2ax_2

0 = (75\:\text{m/s})^2 + 2(-0.65\:\text{m/s}^2)x_2

Solving for x_2, we get

x_2 = \dfrac{(75\:\text{m/s})^2}{2(0.65\:\text{m/s}^2)}

\:\:\:\:\:= 4327\:\text{m}

Therefore, the total distance x is

x = x_1 + x_2 = 1125\:\text{m} + 4327\:\text{m}

\:\:\:\:= 5452\:\text{m}

3 0
3 years ago
For a two-level system, the weight of a given energy distribution can be expressed in terms of the number of systems, N, and the
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

W = N!/(n0! * n1!)

Explanation:

Let n0 = number of particles in the lowest energy state

n1 = number of particles in the excited energy state.

Using this, we can say that N = n0 + n1

From this we can then express the weight, W of the close system by finding the factorials of each particles

W = N!/(n0! * n1!)

Hence, the weight W is expressed as W = N!/(n0! * n1!)

7 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLEAASSEEE ILL MARK U THE BRAINLIEST
Alika [10]

Answer:

Gravitational energy and kinetic energy

7 0
3 years ago
A sled is accelerating down a hill at a rate of 1 m s2 . If the mass of the sled is suddenly cut in half and the net force on th
mihalych1998 [28]
We have that F=ma from the 2nd Newton law where F is the force, m is the mass and a is the acceleration. Suppose we have that F' is the new force and m' is the new mass. Then, we have that a'=F'/m' still, by rearranging Newton's law. We are given that F'=2F and m'=m/2. Hence,
a'= \frac{2F}{ \frac{m}{2} } = \frac{4F}{m} = 4\frac{F}{m}
But now, we have from F=ma, that a=F/m and we are given that a=1m/s^2.
We can substitute thus, a'=4a=4*1m/s^2=4m/s^2.
4 0
3 years ago
How is a conducter different from an insulater
Maru [420]

Answer:

Conductors have magnetic fields; insulators do not have magnetic fields. Conductors do not have magnetic fields; insulators do have magnetic fields. ... In a conductor, electric current cannot flow freely; in an insulator, it can flow freely.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A positive charge on an object is caused by:
    15·2 answers
  • Which force does not operate at a distance of 1 m?
    10·2 answers
  • During a circus act, one performer swings upside down hanging from a trapeze holding another, also upside-down, performer by the
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is always the result when a centripetal force is applied?
    13·2 answers
  • Acellus
    8·1 answer
  • Calculate the following
    8·1 answer
  • How many atoms are present in 2 moles of chromium?
    6·1 answer
  • Lewis structure for BeCI2<br>​
    14·1 answer
  • A uniformly charged conducting sphere of 1.22m radius has a surface charge density 8.13µCm-2.
    15·1 answer
  • Tennis balls experience a large drag force. A tennis ball is hit so that it goes up and then comes back straight down.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!