The correct answer is a descriptive investigation.
An investigation which does not involve hypotheses called descriptive investigation.
Hypotheses are termed as scientific hypotheses and require that one can test it. In hypothesis, previous observation can not satisfactorily be explained with an available scientific theory.
Working hypotheses are being proposed for further research.
A molecular orbital that decreases the electron density between two nuclei is said to be <u>antibonding.</u>
The bonding orbital, which would be more stable and encourages the bonding of the two H atoms into 
, is the orbital that is located in a less energetic state than just the electron shells of the separate atoms. The antibonding orbital, which has higher energy but is less stable, resists bonding when it is occupied.
An asterisk (sigma*) is placed next to the corresponding kind of molecular orbital to indicate an antibonding orbital. The antibonding orbital known as * would be connected to sigma orbitals, as well as antibonding pi orbitals are known as 
* orbitals.
Therefore, molecular orbital that decreases the electron density between two nuclei is said to be <u>antibonding.</u>
<u></u>
Hence, the correct answer will be option (b)
<u />
To know more about molecular orbital
brainly.com/question/13265432
#SPJ4
<u />
<u />
1) You need to use the atomic mass of copper.
You can find it in a periodic table. It is 63.546 amu.
2) The atomic mass is the weigthed mass of the different isotopes.
This is, the atomic mass of one element is the atomic mass of each isotope times its corresponding abundance:
=> atomic mass of the element = abundance isotope 1 * atomic mass isotope 1 + abundance isotope 2 * atomic mass isotope 2 + ....+abundance isotope n * atomic mass isotope n.
3) The statement tells there are two isotopes so the abundance of one is x and the abundance of the other is 1 - x
=> 63.546 amu = x * 62.9296 amu + (1-x)*64.9278
=> 63.546 = 62.9296x + 64.9278 - 64.9278x
=> 64.9278x - 62.9296 = 64.9278 - 63.546
=> 1.9982x = 1.3818
=> x = 1.3818 / 1.9982 = 0.6915 = 69.15%
=> 1 - x = 1 - 0.6915 = 0.3085 = 30.85%
Answer:
Cu-63 69.15%;
Cu-65 : 30.85%
Answer:
I would use calorimetric to determine the specific heat and I would measure the mass of a sample
Explanation:
I would use calorimetry to determine the specific heat.
I would measure the mass of a sample of the substance.
I would heat the substance to a known temperature.
I would place the heated substance into a coffee-cup calorimeter containing a known mass of water with a known initial temperature.
I would wait for the temperature to equilibrate, then calculate temperature change.
I would use the temperature change of water to determine the amount of energy absorbed.
I would use the amount of energy lost by substance, mass, and temperature change to calculate specific heat.
Answer:
The correct answer is because the molecular structure.
Explanation:
The difficulty of ammonia and methane to be represented on paper is due to the molecular structure. These compounds have a three-dimensional projection with defined angles. Ammonia presents angles of 109.5º between the atom of Nitrogen and those of Oxygen. The ammonia presents 107.8º between the oxygen atoms.
In the methane molecule, there is 109.5º between the hydrogen molecules and the carbon atom. This results in the need for a 3D representation of the molecule.
Have a nice day!
