1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rashid [163]
3 years ago
11

Red giants are smaller than main sequence stars, which are smaller than white dwarfs.

Physics
1 answer:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
8 0
<span> False. A Red Giant evolves from a main sequence star after it commences Helium fusion and undergoes a great expansion; in the case of our Sun it would expand to encompass Earth's orbit. Thus, it would have approximately the same mass (a small amount being expelled in the helium flash), and vastly greater volume, equating to vastly lower density.

You're welcome :)
</span>
You might be interested in
What do magnets and electricity have in common
ra1l [238]
They both attract things.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How much of earths gravitational force acts on everyone and everything onboard of the international space station?
liraira [26]

B) Approx. 90%

The actual value is 0.89g

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE ITS AN Emergency IF ITS RIGHT I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
n200080 [17]

Answer:

all of those are pisitions

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
If the force of gravity suddenly stopped acting on planets, they would
Orlov [11]
I believe it is C i am not sure
8 0
3 years ago
The two masses in the Atwood's machine shown in the figure are initially at rest at the same height. After they are released, th
Inga [223]

According to the description given in the photo, the attached figure represents the problem graphically for the Atwood machine.

To solve this problem we must apply the concept related to the conservation of energy theorem.

PART A ) For energy conservation the initial kinetic and potential energy will be the same as the final kinetic and potential energy, so

E_i = E_f

0 = \frac{1}{2} (m_1+m_2)v_f^2-m_2gh+m_1gh

v_f = \sqrt{2gh(\frac{m_2-m_1}{m_1+m_2})}

PART B) Replacing the values given as,

h= 1.7m\\m_1 = 3.5kg\\m_2 = 4.3kg \\g = 9.8m/s^2 \\

v_f = \sqrt{2gh(\frac{m_2-m_1}{m_1+m_2})}

v_f = \sqrt{2(9.8)(1.7)(\frac{4.3-3.5}{3.5+4.3})}

v_f = 1.8486m/s

Therefore the speed of the masses would be 1.8486m/s

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Blank objects is a major cause of back injuries in the workplace
    11·1 answer
  • How many satellites exist in Earth’s orbit today?
    5·1 answer
  • Which is not an example of how an object gains elastic potential energy by stretching?
    11·1 answer
  • g he work functions of gold, aluminum, and cesium are 5.1 eV, 4.1 eV, and 2.1 eV, respectively. If light of a particular frequen
    5·1 answer
  • For a projectile launched from the vertically from the surface the earth with initial velocity v0, the velocity of the projectil
    12·1 answer
  • A fisherman sees 7 wave crests go by in 10.0 s. The crests are 2.43 m apart. Find the period of the wave. (Unit = s)​
    11·2 answers
  • A current-carrying loop of wire lies flat on a horizontal tabletop. When viewed from above, the current moves around the loop in
    9·1 answer
  • I have a pen<br> I have a apple<br> what do I have now?
    8·2 answers
  • Round the following off to required number of significant figures.
    13·2 answers
  • Yoooooooooooooooooourrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!