Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
Answer:
-100m/s not shure tho thx tho
Answer:
a) 27.2 V
b)27.2 V
Explanation:
Charge of the electron =charge of the proton = q = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
Radius = r = 0.53×10⁻¹⁰ m
Electric Potential = V = k q/r
k = 9 ×10⁹ N m²/C² = Coulomb's constant.
V = (9 ×10⁹)(1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)/( 0.53×10⁻¹⁰) = 27.2 V
b) Potential Energy of the electron = k q × q / r
= [(9 ×10⁹)(1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)(1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹) / (0.53×10⁻¹⁰)] / (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹) eV,
since 1 electron volt = (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)joules
= 27.2 eV
