In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
just use the tongs and put it on a plate
Explanation:
The last one will be It's better to use the average data instead of the single trail because the average you don't have to multiply add subtract and all that nonsense but if you use the single trail you will have to do all the adding multiplying etc.
Answer: no
Explanation:
It could be dangerous since you don't know what substance are you adding.it may end up in an explosion
I hope this helps :)
5) state
when the state of the chemical changes that is the most important
