Answer:
Individual versus nature
Explanation:
The type of conflict is <em>individual</em><em> </em><em>versus</em><em> </em><em>nature</em><em> </em>because the cat faced many problems in nature such as facing the mouse, grass, people, etc. These are all considered as nature
<em>PLEASE DO</em><em> </em><em>MARK ME</em><em> </em><em>AS BRAINLIEST</em><em> </em><em>IF</em><em> </em><em>MY ANSWER</em><em> </em><em>IS HELPFUL</em><em> </em><em>;</em><em>)</em><em> </em>
<em>i think the answer is b </em>
<h3>
Answer: b) 0.250 mol</h3>
============================================
Work Shown:
Using the periodic table, we see that
- 1 mole of carbon = 12 grams
- 1 mole of oxygen = 16 grams
These are approximations and these values are often found underneath the atomic symbol. For example, the atomic weight listed under carbon is roughly 12.011 grams. I'm rounding to 2 sig figs in those numbers listed above.
So 1 mole of CO2 is approximately 12+2*16 = 44 grams. The 2 is there since we have 2 oxygens attached to the carbon atom.
-------------------
Since 1 mole of CO2 is 44 grams, we can use that to convert from grams to moles.
11.0 grams of CO2 = (11.0 grams)*(1 mol/44 g) = (11.0/44) mol = 0.250 mol of CO2
In short,
11.0 grams of CO2 = 0.250 mol of CO2
This is approximate.
We don't need to use any of the information in the table.
Answer:
4
Explanation:
Ionization energy can be defined as the energy required for an atom to lose its valence electron to form an ion. Hence, it deals with how easily an atom would lose its electron and form an ion. As the valence electrons are lossless bound to the outermost shell, they can easily be lost without much problem or better still they can be lost easily. Hence, the energy change here is small and thus we can conclude that the ionization energy here is low.
The electron affinity works quite differently from the ionization energy. It deals with the way in which a neutral atom attracts an electron to form an ion. For an electron with loose valence electrons, the sure fact is that it does not really need these electrons. Hence, there is no need for an high electron affinity on its part. Thus, we conclude that the electron affinity is also low
