Answer:
A m 23 3.3 32 m 0.37
Explanation:
So ur still thinking of me Just like I know you should. I cant not give you everything You know I wish I could.
With that information, you can determine the object's speed.
Just divide the distance covered by the time to cover the distance.
If you also know the direction the object moved, then you can
determine its velocity. If you don't, then you can't.
Answer:
Rutherford described the atom as consisting of a tiny positive mass surrounded by a cloud of negative electrons. Bohr thought that electrons orbited the nucleus in quantised orbits. Bohr built upon Rutherford's model of the atom. ... So it was not possible for electrons to occupy just any energy level.
Explanation:
There's no such thing as "stationary in space". But if the distance
between the Earth and some stars is not changing, then (A) w<span>avelengths
measured here would match the actual wavelengths emitted from these
stars. </span><span>
</span><span>If a star is moving toward us in space, then (A) Wavelengths measured
would be shorter than the actual wavelengths emitted from that star.
</span>In order to decide what's actually happening, and how that star is moving,
the trick is: How do we know the actual wavelengths the star emitted ?
Answer:
0.686 g of ice melts each second.
Solution:
As per the question:
Cross-sectional Area of the Copper Rod, A =
Length of the rod, L = 19.6 cm = 0.196 m
Thermal conductivity of Copper, K =
Conduction of heat from the rod per second is given by:
where
= temperature difference between the two ends of the rod.
Thus
Now,
To calculate the mass, M of the ice melted per sec:
where
= Latent heat of fusion of water = 333 kJ/kg