All categories

3 years ago

Experiencing a green afterimage of a red object is most easily explained by

Physics

2 answers:

Sonja [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

opponent process theory.

Explanation:

Experiencing a green afterimage of a red object is most easily explained by using opponent process theory.

The opponent process theory suggests that one color pair dominates the other color. For instance we often see yellowish-greens and reddish-yellows, however, we never see reddish-green or yellowish-blue colors. The hypothesis was originally suggested in the late nineteenth's century by the German physiologist Ewald Hering.

il63 [147K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The opponent-process theory

Explanation:

The opponent process theory is based on the human visual system and according to the theory the interpretation of the color is done by the photo-receptors rods and cones in the human eye.

This theory states that the perception of color is governed by the two opponent system which includes - a red-green, a blue-yellow and a black-white mechanism.

Any activity in one of these restricts the activity in the other.

You might be interested in

What is the experimental group(s)?

Vinil7 [7]

<h3>I think it B The group(s) that gets the special treatment.</h3><h3 /><h3>I hope this is correct.</h3><h3 /><h3 /><h3 />

5 0

3 years ago

Where is the near point of an eye for which a contact lens with a power of +2.55 diopters is prescribed?Where is the far point o

tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

(a). The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.

(b). The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.

Explanation:

Given that,

Power = 2.55 D

Object distance = 25 cm for near point

Object distance = ∞ for far point

Suppose where is the far point of an eye for which a contact lens with a power of -3.00 D is prescribed for distant vision?

(a) We need to calculate the focal length

Using formula of power

$f =\dfrac{1}{P}$

Put the value into the formula

$f=\dfrac{100}{2.55}$

$f=39.21\ cm$

We need to calculate the image distance

Using formula of lens

$\dfrac{1}{f}=\dfrac{1}{v}-\dfrac{1}{u}$

Put the value into the formula

$\dfrac{1}{39.21}=\dfrac{1}{v}-\dfrac{1}{-25}$

$\dfrac{1}{39.21}-\dfrac{1}{25}=\dfrac{1}{v}$

$\dfrac{1}{v}=-\dfrac{1421}{98025}$

$v=-68.98\ cm$

The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.

(b). We need to calculate the focal length

Using formula of power

$f =\dfrac{1}{P}$

Put the value into the formula

$f=-\dfrac{100}{3.00}$

$f=-33.33\ cm$

We need to calculate the image distance

Using formula of lens

$\dfrac{1}{f}=\dfrac{1}{v}-\dfrac{1}{u}$

Put the value into the formula

$\dfrac{1}{-33.33}=\dfrac{1}{v}-\dfrac{1}{\infty}$

$-\dfrac{1}{33.33}+\dfrac{1}{\infty}=\dfrac{1}{v}$

$\dfrac{1}{v}=-\dfrac{1}{33.33}$

$v=-33.33\ cm$

The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.

Hence, (a). The eye's near point is 68.98 cm from the eye.

(b). The eye's far point is 33.33 cm from the eye.

5 0

3 years ago

What is the average velocity of a car if it travels from position 25m to a position of -7m in 34 seconds?

zubka84 [21]

Answer:

vp = 0.94 m/s

Explanation

Formula

Vp = position/ time

position: Initial position - Final position

Position = 25 m - (-7 m) = 25 m + 7 m = 32 m

Then

Vp = 32 m / 34 seconds

Vp = 0.94 m/s

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Increasing the amount of current that flows through a wire ______ the strength of an electromagnet

Anestetic [448]

Electromagnet is in form of solenoid

and the magnetic field due to solenoid is given as

$B = \mu_0 n i$

here

i = current in the loop

so when we increase the current in electromagnet the magnetic field of the solenoid will increase

this will increase the strength of the electromagnet

so the answer would be

<em>INCREASE</em>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The rate constants for the reactions of atomic chlorine and of hydroxyl radical with ozone are given by 3 × 10-11 e-250/T and 2

Vlada [557]

Answer:

Calculate the ratio of the rates of ozone destruction by these catalysts at 20 km, given that at this altitude the average concentration of OH is about 100 times that of Cl and that the temperature is about -50 °C

Knowing

Rate constants for the reactions of atomic chlorine and of hydroxyl radical with ozone are given by 3x $10^{-11} e^{-255/T}$ and 2x $10^{-12} e^{-940/T}$

T = -50 °C = 223 K

The reaction rate will be given by [Cl] [O3] 3x $10^{-11} e^{-255/223} = 9.78^{-12} [Cl] [O3]$

Than, the reaction rate of OH with O3 is

Rate = [OH] [O3] 2x $10^{-12} e^{-940/223} = 2.95^{-14} [OH] [O3]$

Considering these 2 rates we can realize the ratio of the reaction with Cl to the reaction with OH is 330 * [Cl] / [OH]

Than, the concentration of OH is approximately 100 times of Cl, and the result will be that the reaction with Cl is 3.3 times faster than the reaction with OH

Calculate the rate constant for ozone destruction by chlorine under conditions in the Antarctic ozone hole, when the temperature is about -80 °C and the concentration of atomic chlorine increases by a factor of one hundred to about 4 × 105 molecules cm-3

Knowing

Rate constants for the reactions of atomic chlorine and of hydroxyl radical with ozone are given by 3x $10^{-11} e^{-255/T}$ and 2x $10^{-12} e^{-940/T}$

T = -80 °C = 193 K

The reaction rate will be given by [Cl] [O3] 3x $10^{-11} e^{-255/193} = 8.21^{-12} [Cl] [O3]$

Than, the reaction rate of OH with O3 is

Rate = [OH] [O3] 2x $10^{-12} e^{-940/193} = 1.53^{-14} [OH] [O3]$

Considering these 2 rates we can realize the ratio of the reaction with Cl to the reaction with OH is 535 * [Cl] / [OH]

Than, considering the concentration of Cl increases by a factor of 100 to about 4 × $10^{5}$ molecules $cm^{-3}$ , the result will be that the reaction with OH will be 535 + (100 to about 4 × $10^{5}$ molecules $cm^{-3}$ ) times faster than the reaction with Cl

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago