All categories

2 years ago

Microwaves and infrared waves are similar because they both have

Physics

2 answers:

Alex787 [66]2 years ago

7 0

The both have radiation waves. I hope this helps!

Roman55 [17]2 years ago

5 0

1.Both are forms of electromagnetic radiation. 2, Both are transmitted as waves. 3. Waves are converted to heat. I hope one of these are what you need.

You might be interested in

(a) Write an equation describing a sinusoidal transverse wave traveling on a cord in the positive of a y axis with an angular wa

Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Missing data: the wave number

$k=60 cm^{-1}$

(a) $z = 0.003 sin (6000y-31.4 t)$

For a transverse wave travelling in the positive y-direction and with vibration along the z-direction, the equation of the wave is

$z = A sin (ky-\omega t)$

where

A is the amplitude of the wave

k is the wave number

$\omega$ is the angular frequency

t is the time

In this situation:

A = 3.0 mm = 0.003 m is the amplitude

$k = 60 cm^{-1} = 6000 m^{-1}$ is the wave number

$T = 0.20 s$ is the period, so the angular frequency is

$\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}=\frac{2\pi}{0.20}=31.4 rad/s$

So, the wave equation (in meters) is

$z = 0.003 sin (6000y-31.4 t)$

(b) 0.094 m/s

For a transverse wave, the transverse speed is equal to the derivative of the displacement of the wave, so in this case:

$v_t = z' = -A \omega cos (ky-\omega t)$

So the maximum transverse wave occurs when the cosine term is equal to 1, therefore the maximum transverse speed must be

$v_{t}_{max} =\omega A$

where

$\omega = 31.4 rad/s\\A = 0.003 m$

Substituting,

$v_{t}_{max}=(31.4)(0.003)=0.094 m/s$

(c) 5.24 mm/s

The wave speed is given by

$v=f \lambda$

where

f is the frequency of the wave

$\lambda$ is the wavelength

The frequency can be found from the angular frequency:

$f=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}=\frac{31.4}{2\pi}=5 Hz$

While the wavelength can be found from the wave number:

$\lambda = \frac{2\pi}{k}=\frac{2\pi}{6000}=1.05\cdot 10^{-3} m$

Therefore, the wave speed is

$v=(5)(1.05\cdot 10^{-3} )=5.24 \cdot 10^{-3} m/s = 5.24 mm/s$

7 0

3 years ago

Think about the various energy sources such as the sun, fossil fuels, water, wind, and nuclear power. What is the energy source

lakkis [162]

Answer:

The energy source that powers my home is gotten from burning of fossil fuels.

No! I do not like this energy source.

I personally would prefer solar source of electricity

Explanation:

Fossil fuels are fuels gotten from the decomposition of dead organisms over time, under intense heat and pressure. They are usually found buried beneath the earth's crust where they have been formed and trapped.

Most electricity generating stations generate electricity by burning fossil fuels like natural gas and gasoline to generate electricity. The problem with fossil fuels are the various part that they play in increasing carbon footprints in the atmosphere. The excess carbon in the atmosphere has been a major contributor to the global warming of planet Earth.

My preference for solar energy source is first due to its abundance unlike the fossil fuels that are already diminishing in storage beneath the earth's crust. Also, solar energy is a clean source of energy that does not leave any damage on earth from its use. It also promises to be a cheap source of power in the future with advances in solar technologies.

8 0

2 years ago

A solid non-conducting sphere of radius R carries a charge Q distributed uniformly throughout its volume. At a radius r (r <

Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

Hence the answer is E inside $= KQr_{1} /R^{3}$ .

Explanation:

E inside $= KQr_{1} /R^{3}$

so if r1 will be the same then

E $\begin{bmatrix}Blank Equation\end{bmatrix}$ proportional to 1/R3

so if R become 2R

E becomes 1/8 of the initial electric field.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Many minerals, such as silver, are good conductors of heat and electricity. How could technology use this property to help ident

Aleks [24]

Answer:

This property could be used to create technologically-advanced tools or machines that could easily locate the mineral deposits.

Explanation:

Mineral deposits are hard to find, unless you have the skill or the proper tools in locating them. This is the reason why many people are mining in order to explore the different areas where they could find these deposits.

If one would consider the property of minerals, such as being good conductors of heat and electricity, then they could create a tool or machine that would aid in their exploration. Inventors could probably come up with a sensitive detector which signals when it reaches an area of high heat and electric conductivity. Since most minerals such as gold, silver, copper, galena, bornite and the like have this property, then miners will have a lesser amount of time looking for them.

If this technology will be implemented, though, regulation policy must be strictly implemented because it might lead to over-mining thus leading to the depletion of mineral deposits.

3 0

2 years ago

R S ( M ) = 2 G M c 2 , where G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light. It is okay if you do not follow the d

padilas [110]

The provided question's answer is "Schwarzschild radius".

The conversion factor between mass and energy is the speed of light squared.

GM/r stands for gravitational potential energy, also known as energy per unit mass.

GM/rc² then has "mass per unit mass" units. In other words, as mass/mass splits out in a dimensional analysis, "dimensionless per unit."

The derivation yields a formula for time or space coordinate ratios requiring sqrt(1 - 2GM/rc²). This number becomes 0 when r=2GM/c2, or the formula becomes infinite if in the denominator. However, there is no justification for using c² as a conversion factor there. Consider the initial expression sqrt(1 - 2GM/rc²).

Assume that m is used as the test particle's mass instead of 1. Then you have sqrt(m - 2GMm/rc² and mass units. This expression denotes that the rest energy of the test mass m you introduced into the gravitational field is "gone" at that radius.

The 2 would be absent if the gravitational field were Newtonian. However, at the event horizon, Einstein gravity is slightly stronger than Newton gravity, resulting in the factor 2 in qualitative terms.

So, the given equation is of Schwarzschild radius.

Learn more about Schwarzschild radius here:

brainly.com/question/12647190

#SPJ10

3 0

2 years ago