1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
14

Solutions to environmental problems ________.

Physics
1 answer:
hjlf3 years ago
5 0

Answer: B. Must be designed with sustainable goals

Explanation: While there are several problems and issues plaguing the world especially those concerning the environment, for which solutions are proposed and developed, care are taken to ensure that these designs don't negatively impact other aspects of the society. As such, developing solutions to environmental issues must be in line with sustainability and its goals currently in place to ensure good environmental quality and general well-being of members of society without compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their needs. In this we are aware of our resource consumption while reducing unnecessary waste among others.

You might be interested in
Alli was in the park playing on the equipment. she noticed that on the highest slide she slides down
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Is this answer complete????

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This diagram shows particles that make up an atom. Which label BEST completes the diagram ?
worty [1.4K]
Answer: option A. strong nuclear force.

Explanation:

The diagram shows the subatomic particles inside the nucelous: protons and neutrons.

As you know, the protons are positively charged partilces inside the nucleous.

Being those particles charged with the same kind of charge they experiment electrostatic repulsion. So, how do you explain that they can stand together in such small space as it is the nucleous?

The responsible of keeping the subatomic particles together is the so called strong nuclear force.

Strong nuclear force or simply strong force is one of the four fundamental interactions or forces: i) gravitational, ii) electromagnetic, iii) weak nuclear force, and iv) strong nuclear force.

Strong nuclear force is the strongest force of nature and acts only in short distances as those inside the nucleous and is responsible for both the atraction among quarks and the atraction among protons to bind them together inside the atomic nucleous.


8 0
3 years ago
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Aligned magnetic domains are only present in which of the following?
butalik [34]

Answer:

i think c

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A spherical ball is dropped through a liquid, explain why it reaches terminal velocity.
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Probably because of the drag coefficient and the density of the liquid.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. A child observes a caterpillar walking on a window sill. The caterpillar walks 18 cm to the left, then 6 cm to
    5·1 answer
  • If a beaker of water is placed under a broiler so that the heating coil is above the beaker. It is observed that only the surfac
    7·1 answer
  • Calculate the acceleration of a 1400-kg car that stops from 39 km/h "on a dime" (on a distance of 1.7 cm).
    5·1 answer
  • Which body have a period of revolution of 29.6 days?
    10·2 answers
  • Which in is it Speed (S) or Velocity (V)?
    6·1 answer
  • A glass of water sits on a scale. The scale reads 4.78 N. A steel bolt weighs 2.07 N. The density of steel is 7.86 g/cm3. We tie
    14·1 answer
  • When students work in a chemistry lab, the location of which item would be the most important for each student to know?
    13·2 answers
  • HELLO ONCE MORE FRIENDS . PLEASE HELP ME.
    5·2 answers
  • A 0.413 kg block requires 1.09 N
    12·1 answer
  • What is the period, in seconds, that corresponds to each of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!