Answer: Provided in the explanation
Explanation:
I have understood that I have been influenced by the 'affinity bias' for quite a while. It caused me to feel fascination and feel better and right about individuals who had comparable intrigue and thought designs. I sort of began to feel this is the one for me based on those likenesses yet later used to be miserable when I comprehended that those similitudes are not many and insufficient consistently. I have begun to beat this inclination by rehearsing self reflection. I have begun to think about what causes me to feel pulled in to somebody and on the off chance that I introspect that it's exclusively founded on likenesses, at that point I cause myself to get that and monitoring that helps in escaping the inclination.
I make an effort not to get into the snare of paradoxes in my own announcements yet I have been forced to bear deceptions during contentions. One deception which I have encountered most is the 'Foul play' error as there have been a great deal of occurrences when individuals began to tear down me and my family when they couldn't win on a contention regarding balanced and rationale.
Basic reasoning causes us in understanding our defects and those issues of our own which keeps us from taking better choices and furthermore forestalls us tackling issues in more successful manners. Through basic reasoning, one can reflect and recognize utilization of deceptions in the contentions and that will help him in deciphering the circumstance from an alternate perspective. He will assess the circumstance better and through appropriate induction, he will have the option to get over those issues in thinking and subsequently, have the option to take better and more powerful choices for taking care of an issue.
The most fascinating idea which I have learned is that of the utilization of reflection or explicitly self reflection to comprehend ourselves better and furthermore to display basic reasoning appropriately. Being said that, I am a still somewhat confused about the manners by which we can reflect appropriately at each circumstance in a successful manner. This disarray remains in light of the fact that most deceptions and predispositions are oblivious in nature while the basic considering aptitudes reflection is cognizant and I meander whether a cognizant ability will have the option to break down and distinguish each oblivious inclinations or whether a few guards will keep a few inclinations covered up.
Answer:
a-
V= IR
9V = I ×( 12+6)
I = 9/ 18 A = 0.5 A
b
V=IR
240 = 6 A ×( 20 + R)
40 = 20 + R
R = 20 ohm
c
resultant resistance of the 2 parallel resistances= Ro
1/Ro = 1/ 5 + 1/ 20
1/Ro =( 20+5)/100
= 1/Ro = 1/4
Ro= 4 ohm
V=IR
V = 2A × ( 1+ 4 OHM)
V = 10V
d
equivalent resistance = Ro
1/Ro = 1/(2+8) + 1/(5+5)
1/Ro = 1/10 +1/10
2/10 = 1/ Ro
Ro= 10/2 = 5 ohm
V = IR
12V = I × 5Ohm
I=2.4 A
Answer:
h'=0.25m/s
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem, we need to start by drawing a diagram of the given situation. (See attached image).
So, the problem talks about an inverted circular cone with a given height and radius. The problem also tells us that water is being pumped into the tank at a rate of 
. As you may see, the problem is talking about a rate of volume over time. So we need to relate the volume, with the height of the cone with its radius. This relation is found on the volume of a cone formula:
notie the volume formula has two unknowns or variables, so we need to relate the radius with the height with an equation we can use to rewrite our volume formula in terms of either the radius or the height. Since in this case the problem wants us to find the rate of change over time of the height of the gasoline tank, we will need to rewrite our formula in terms of the height h.
If we take a look at a cross section of the cone, we can see that we can use similar triangles to find the equation we are looking for. When using similar triangles we get:
When solving for r, we get:
so we can substitute this into our volume of a cone formula:
which simplifies to:
So now we can proceed and find the partial derivative over time of each of the sides of the equation, so we get:
Which simplifies to:
So now I can solve the equation for dh/dt (the rate of height over time, the velocity at which height is increasing)
So we get:
Now we can substitute the provided values into our equation. So we get:
so:
Definition formula for momentum: P = mv
So P(A) = 0.45 * 50 = 22.5 kgm/s
P(B) = 0.45 * 80 = 36 kgm/s
P(C) = 0.45 * 25 = 11.25 kgm/s
B has the greatest momentum
R = ρ L/A. R= resistance, ρ= resistivity, L= length of the conductor. A = area of the conductor. Resistance is directly proportional to the length of the conductor. So if length of the conductor is decreased, resistance will also decrease. Hence A is the correct option
