1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natali 33 [55]
3 years ago
12

“In a 2009 study, presented by the National Academy of Science, 97% of climate scientists agree that human activity is causing g

lobal warming." Which of the following statements is best supported by this study? A. Most climate scientists dispute the theory of human influence on global warming. B. Global warming is most likely alarmist propaganda based on false data. C. Global warming is definitely not caused by human influence on nature. D. Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming.
Physics
2 answers:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
7 0

“Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming”  is best supported by this study.

 

The drastic increase in the emission of CO2 (carbon dioxide) within the last 30 yearscaused<span> by burning fossil fuels has been identified as the major </span>reason<span> for the change of temperature in the atmosphere (click the following link for a summary and graphs about the </span>cause<span> and effects of </span>global warming).

 

The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice or letter D. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
5 0
Depending on exactly how you measure the expert consensus, it’s somewhere between 90% and 100% that agree humans are responsible for climate change, with most of our studies finding 97% consensus among publishing climate<span> scientists.
</span>A survey of all peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused (Orestes 2004<span>). 75% of the papers agreed with the consensus position while 25% made no comment either way (focused on methods or paleo-climate analysis).
</span>Hence,the best answer is : 
<span>D. Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming.</span>
You might be interested in
A straight fin is made from copper (k = 388 W/m-K) and is 0.5 cm in diameter and 30 cm long. The temperature at the base of the
erastovalidia [21]

Answer:

The rate of transfer of heat is 0.119 W

Solution:

As per the question:

Diameter of the fin, D = 0.5 cm = 0.005 m

Length of the fin, l =30 cm = 0.3 m

Base temperature, T_{b} = 75^{\circ}C

Air temperature, T_{infty} = 20^{\circ}

k = 388 W/mK

h = 20\ W/m^{2}K

Now,

Perimeter of the fin, p = \pi D = 0.005\pi \ m

Cross-sectional area of the fin, A = \frac{\pi}{4}D^{2}

A = \frac{\pi}{4}(0.5\times 10^{-2})^{2} = 6.25\times 10^{- 6}\pi \ m^{2}

To calculate the heat transfer rate:

Q_{f} = \sqrt{hkpA}tanh(ml)(T_{b} - T_{infty})

where

m = \sqrt{\frac{hp}{kA}} = \sqrt{\frac{20\times 0.005\pi}{388\times 6.25\times 10^{- 6}\pi}} = 41.237

Now,

Q_{f} = \sqrt{20\times 388\times 0.005\pi\times 6.25\times 10^{- 6}\pi}tanh(41.237\times 0.3)(75 - 20) = 0.119\ W

5 0
3 years ago
A 5.5kg mass is pushed with a force of 31N across a table having μk of 0.350. Find how fast it will accelerate, taking friction
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

3.66m/s^2

Explanation:

First, we need to find the friction which is F=u*N.

After that, find the resultant force by substarcting the friction from the forward force.

Lastly,using the formula F=ma, substitute in the known values of F and m to find a

4 0
3 years ago
A set is any collection of objects. true or false.
Semenov [28]
It can be, but set also means many other things.
3 0
3 years ago
Is "A firecracker that has not been lit kinetic, or potential energy?
love history [14]
A firecracker before been lit has potential energy in it. It is chemical potential energy which is due to the explosives in it.When it is lit, it gets converted into heat,light and kinetic energy.
7 0
3 years ago
Everything is in the pic.
nikitadnepr [17]
The answer is A

Good luck!
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which parts of the spectrum show the presence of elements in the stars atmosphere
    5·2 answers
  • The atomic mass of an atom (in amu) is equal to
    11·1 answer
  • What is the efficiency of the machine in Figure 7.2 if the weight of the box is 200 N and required 98 N of effort Force?
    13·1 answer
  • When a car accelerates from a standing start, the crash test dummy appears to be pressed backward into the seat cushion. Which o
    12·1 answer
  • A toy train is traveling along a circular track
    13·1 answer
  • If the delay of the 10-bit adder is 1ns, the setup time, the hold time, and the propagation delay of the registers is 0.3 ns, 0.
    7·1 answer
  • Please I need help its timed-
    13·2 answers
  • If the speed of the wave is 12 m/s and the frequency is 2.3 Hz, what is the <br> wavelength?
    6·1 answer
  • what is the cost of monthly (30 days) electric bill of ana if her city's cost of electricity is 0.05$ per kwh and she uses three
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me with this rotation and linear motion problem
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!