1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natali 33 [55]
3 years ago
12

“In a 2009 study, presented by the National Academy of Science, 97% of climate scientists agree that human activity is causing g

lobal warming." Which of the following statements is best supported by this study? A. Most climate scientists dispute the theory of human influence on global warming. B. Global warming is most likely alarmist propaganda based on false data. C. Global warming is definitely not caused by human influence on nature. D. Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming.
Physics
2 answers:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
7 0

“Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming”  is best supported by this study.

 

The drastic increase in the emission of CO2 (carbon dioxide) within the last 30 yearscaused<span> by burning fossil fuels has been identified as the major </span>reason<span> for the change of temperature in the atmosphere (click the following link for a summary and graphs about the </span>cause<span> and effects of </span>global warming).

 

The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice or letter D. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
5 0
Depending on exactly how you measure the expert consensus, it’s somewhere between 90% and 100% that agree humans are responsible for climate change, with most of our studies finding 97% consensus among publishing climate<span> scientists.
</span>A survey of all peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused (Orestes 2004<span>). 75% of the papers agreed with the consensus position while 25% made no comment either way (focused on methods or paleo-climate analysis).
</span>Hence,the best answer is : 
<span>D. Most climate scientists believe that there is evidence that explains global warming.</span>
You might be interested in
The weight of the mass added to the hanger is equal to the extra force on the gas, but what area should we use to calculate the
kari74 [83]

Answer: according to the Avagadro's law, volume is directly propotional to no of moles: VXn

according to the Charles law, volume is directly propotional to  temperatue: VXT

according to the Boyle's law, volume is inversely propotional to P: VX1/P

when we combine them we get:

VXnT1/P

V=knT/P

k= R(universal gas constant)

V=RnT/P

PV=nRT  

8 0
3 years ago
A 4-lb ball b is traveling around in a circle of radius r1 = 3 ft with a speed (vb)1 = 6 ft&gt;s. if the attached cord is pulled
Leya [2.2K]
Position #1:
radius, r₁ = 3 ft
Tangential speed, v₁ = 6 ft/s

By definition, the angular speed is
ω₁ = v₁/r₁ = (3 ft/s) / (3 ft) = 1 rad/s

Position #2:
Radius, r₂ = 2 ft

By definition, the moment of inertia in positions 1 and 2 are respectively
I₁ = (4 lb)*(3 ft)² = 36 lb-ft²
I₂ = (4 lb)*(2 ft)² = 16 lb-ft²

Because momentum is conserved,
I₁ω₁ = I₂ω₂
Therefore the angular velocity in position 2 is
ω₂ = (I₁/I₂)ω₁
      = (36/16)*1 = 2.25 rad/s
The tangential velocity in position 2 is
v₂ = r₂ω₂ = (2 ft)*(225 rad/s) = 4.5 ft/s

At each position, there is an outward centripetal force.
In position 1, the centripetal force is
F₁ = m*(v²/r₂) = (4)*(6²/3) = 48 lbf
In position 2, the centripetal force is
F₂ = (4)*(4.5²/2) = 40.5 lbf

The radius diminishes at a rate of 2 ft/s.
Therefore the force versus distance curve is as shown below.

The work done is the area under the curve, and it is
W = (1/2)*(48.0+40.5 ft)*(3-2 ft) = 44.25 ft-lb

Answer:  44.25 ft-lb


6 0
3 years ago
Describe the difference between balanced forces and action/reaction forces
Alecsey [184]
 Balanced forces<span> act on the same object and </span>Action-Reaction forces<span> act on different objects.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
suppose that a large cargo truck needs to cross a bridge. the truck is 30 m long and 3.2 m wide. the cargo exerts a force nof 54
Tamiku [17]
<span>No, because the truck applies more pressure than the bridge can support.</span>
7 0
2 years ago
You launch a cannonball at an angle of 35° and an initial velocity of 36 m/s (assume y = y₁=
velikii [3]

Answer:

Approximately 4.2\; {\rm s} (assuming that the projectile was launched at angle of 35^{\circ} above the horizon.)

Explanation:

Initial vertical component of velocity:

\begin{aligned}v_{y} &= v\, \sin(35^{\circ}) \\ &= (36\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}})\, (\sin(35^{\circ})) \\ &\approx 20.6\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}\end{aligned}.

The question assumed that there is no drag on this projectile. Additionally, the altitude of this projectile just before landing y_{1} is the same as the altitude y_{0} at which this projectile was launched: y_{0} = y_{1}.

Hence, the initial vertical velocity of this projectile would be the exact opposite of the vertical velocity of this projectile right before landing. Since the initial vertical velocity is 20.6\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} (upwards,) the vertical velocity right before landing would be (-20.6\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) (downwards.) The change in vertical velocity is:

\begin{aligned}\Delta v_{y} &= (-20.6\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) - (20.6\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) \\ &= -41.2\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}\end{aligned}.

Since there is no drag on this projectile, the vertical acceleration of this projectile would be g. In other words, a = g = -9.81\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2}}.

Hence, the time it takes to achieve a (vertical) velocity change of \Delta v_{y} would be:

\begin{aligned} t &= \frac{\Delta v_{y}}{a_{y}} \\ &= \frac{-41.2\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}}{-9.81\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-2}}} \\ &\approx 4.2\; {\rm s} \end{aligned}.

Hence, this projectile would be in the air for approximately 4.2\; {\rm s}.

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Now let’s apply Coulomb’s law and the superposition principle to calculate the force on a point charge due to the presence of ot
    11·1 answer
  • Wo gravitational forces act on a particle, in perpendicular directions. to find the net force, can we add the magnitudes of thos
    11·1 answer
  • Katie rolls a toy car off the end of a table. Which path will the car follow when it leaves the table? A. B. C. D.
    12·2 answers
  • A 12 kg bowling ball would require what force to accelerate down and alleyway at a rate of 3 m/s²?
    7·1 answer
  • The gravitational force exerted on a baseball is 2.24 N down. A pitcher throws the ball horizontally with velocity 17.0 m/s by u
    14·1 answer
  • What two measurements are necessary for calculating velocity?
    5·1 answer
  • A student is helping her teacher move a 9.5 kg box of books. What net sideways force must she exert on the box to slide it acros
    6·1 answer
  • A jet plane travels at 40.8 km at an average speed of 340 m/s calculate how long this journey took- giveyour answer to the neare
    8·1 answer
  • What do you know about a laser to predict its performance as a surgical tool? Give at least four factors and explain the signifi
    13·1 answer
  • A solid sphere rolls along a horizontal, smooth surface at a constant linear speed without slipping. What is the ratio between t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!