Answer:
If the heat engine operates for one hour:
a) the fuel cost at Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $409.09 while fuel 2 is $421.88.
b) the fuel cost at 40% of Carnot efficiency for fuel 1 is $1022.73 while fuel 2 is $1054.68.
In both cases the total cost of using fuel 1 is minor, therefore it is recommended to use this fuel over fuel 2. The final observation is that fuel 1 is cheaper.
Explanation:
The Carnot efficiency is obtained as:
Where 
is the atmospheric temperature and 
is the maximum burn temperature.
For the case (B), the efficiency we will use is:
The work done by the engine can be calculated as:
where Hv is the heat value.
If the average net power of the engine is work over time, considering a net power of 2.5MW for 1 hour (3600s), we can calculate the mass of fuel used in each case.
If we want to calculate the total fuel cost, we only have to multiply the fuel mass with the cost per kilogram.
Answer:
Hello your question has some missing information below are the missing information
The refrigerant enters the compressor as saturated vapor at 140kPa Determine The coefficient of performance of this heat pump
answer : 2.49
Explanation:
For vapor-compression refrigeration cycle
P1 = P4 ; P1 = 140 kPa
P2( pressure at inlet ) = P3 ( pressure at outlet ) ; P2 = 800 kPa
<u>From pressure table of R 134a refrigerant</u>
h1 ( enthalpy of saturated vapor at 140kPa ) = 239.16 kJ/kg
h2 ( enthalpy of saturated liquid at P2 = 800 kPa and t = 60°C )
= 296.8kJ/kg
h3 ( enthalpy of saturated liquid at P3 = 800 kPa ) = 95.47 kJ/kg
also h4 = 95.47 kJ/kg
To determine the coefficient of performance
Cop = ( h1 - h4 ) / ( h2 - h1 )
∴ Cop = 2.49
Answer:
The difference in weight and size?
Explanation:
It explains itself :P
Answer:
The total number of people whom have made machines is not a recorded figure? Need to be more specific :/
Explanation:
Sorry not very helpful, your question is REALLY broad
