Answer:
The maximum value of the induced magnetic field is 
.
Explanation:
Given that,
Radius of plate = 30 mm
Separation = 5.0 mm
Frequency = 60 Hz
Suppose the maximum potential difference is 100 V and r= 130 mm.
We need to calculate the angular frequency
Using formula of angular frequency
Put the value into the formula
When r>R, the magnetic field is inversely proportional to the r.
We need to calculate the maximum value of the induced magnetic field that occurs at r = R
Using formula of magnetic filed
Where, R = radius of plate
d = plate separation
V = voltage
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The maximum value of the induced magnetic field is .
The heat coming from the sun warms the land more quickly than the sea. As a result of these, the air near the land warm up and rises and the cooler air from the sea moves in to replace the risen air. The correct answer is option A
There will be heat transfer from a region of higher temperature to the region of lower temperature. But in the case of land and sea breeze, the transfer of heat are the result of convectional current in nature. Because the land is a better absorber of heat and also has a lower specific heat capacity compare to sea, during the day, the heat coming from the sun warms the land more quickly than the sea. As a result of these, the air near the land warm up and rises.
The cooler air from the sea moves in to replace the risen air.
Why do ocean winds or sea breezes blow toward shore during the day ? It is because air over the beach heats up, rises and is replaced by ocean air.
Therefore, option A is correct
Learn more here : brainly.com/question/1114842
deceleration or rėtardation i’m pretty sure (it won’t let me say the second word but it’s correct)
Answer: it is D. it is the only possible answer. use the process of elimination. which answers make sense?
Wow ! I understand your shock. I shook and vibrated a little
when I looked at this one too.
The reason for our shock is all the extra junk in the question,
put there just to shock and distract us.
"Neutron star", "5.5 solar masses", "condensed burned-out star".
That's all very picturesque, and it excites cosmic fantasies in
out brains when we read it, but it's just malicious decoration.
It only gets in the way, and doesn't help a bit.
The real question is:
What is the acceleration of gravity 2000 m from
the center of a mass of 1.1 x 10³¹ kg ?
Acceleration of gravity is
G · M / R²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²) · (1.1 x 10³¹ kg) / (2000 m)²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ · 1.1 x 10³¹ / 4 x 10⁶) (N) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ (kg · m / s²) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ m / s²
That's about 1.87 x 10¹³ times the acceleration of gravity on
Earth's surface.
In other words, if I were standing on the surface of that neutron star,
I would weigh 1.82 x 10¹² tons, give or take.
