1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
15

A solution of HNO3HNO3 is standardized by reaction with pure sodium carbonate. 2H++Na2CO3⟶2Na++H2O+CO2 2H++Na2CO3⟶2Na++H2O+CO2 A

volume of 27.71±0.05 mL27.71±0.05 mL of HNO3HNO3 solution was required for complete reaction with 0.9585±0.0007 g0.9585±0.0007 g of Na2CO3Na2CO3 , (FM 105.988±0.001 g/mol105.988±0.001 g/mol ). Find the molarity of the HNO3HNO3 solution and its absolute uncertainty.
Chemistry
1 answer:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

(0,653±0,002) M of HNO₃

Explanation:

The reaction of standarization of HNO₃ with Na₂CO₃ is:

2 HNO₃ + Na₂CO₃ ⇒ 2 Na⁺ + H₂O + CO₂ + 2NO₃⁻

To obtain molarity of HNO₃ we need to know both moles and volume of this acid. The volume is (27,71±0,05) mL and to calculate the moles it is necessary to obtain the Na₂CO₃ moles and then convert these to HNO₃ moles, thus:

0,9585 g of Na₂CO₃ × ( 1 mole / 105,988 g) =

9,043×10⁻³ mol Na₂CO₃ × ( 2 moles of HNO₃ / 1 mole of Na₂CO₃) = 1,809×10⁻² moles of HNO₃

Molarity is moles divide liters, thus, molarity of HNO₃ is:

1,809×10⁻² moles / 0,02771 L = 0,6527 M of HNO₃

The absolute uncertainty of multiplication is the sum of relative uncertainty, thus:

ΔM = 0,6527M× (0,0007/0,9585 + 0,001/105,988 + 0,05/27,71) =

0,6527 M× 2,54×10⁻³ = 1,7×10⁻³ M

Thus, molarity of HNO₃ solution and its absolute uncertainty is:

(0,653±0,002) M of HNO₃

I hope it helps!

You might be interested in
One reaction involved in the conversion of iron ore to the metal is FeO(s) + CO(g) → Fe(s) + CO2(g) Use Hess’s Law to calculate
Ugo [173]

Answer:

\delta H_{rxn} = -66.0  \ kJ/mole

Explanation:

Given that:

3FeO_3_{(s)}+CO_{(g)} \to 2Fe_3O_4_{(s)} +CO_{2(g)} \  \ \delta H = -47.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (1)  \\ \\ \\ Fe_2O_3_{(s)} +3CO_{(g)} \to 2FE_{(s)} + 3CO_{2(g)}  \ \ \delta H = -25.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (2)  \\ \\ \\ Fe_3O_4_{(s)} + CO_{(g)} \to 3FeO_{(s)} + CO_{2(g)} \ \delta H = 19.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (3)

From equation (3) , multiplying (-1) with equation (3) and interchanging reactant with the product side; we have:

3FeO_{(s)} + CO_{2(g)}    \to    Fe_3O_4_{(s)} + CO_{(g)}   \ \delta H = -19.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (4)

Multiplying  (2) with equation (4) ; we have:

6FeO_{(s)} + 2CO_{2(g)}    \to    2Fe_3O_4_{(s)} + 2CO_{(g)}   \ \delta H = -38.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (5)

From equation (1) ; multiplying (-1) with equation (1); we have:

2Fe_3O_4_{(s)} +CO_{2(g)} \to     3FeO_3_{(s)}+CO_{(g)}   \  \ \delta H = 47.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (6)

From equation (2); multiplying (3) with equation (2); we have:

3 Fe_2O_3_{(s)} +9CO_{(g)} \to 6FE_{(s)} + 9CO_{2(g)}  \ \ \delta H = -75.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (7)

Now; Adding up equation (5), (6) & (7) ; we get:

6FeO_{(s)} + 2CO_{2(g)}    \to    2Fe_3O_4_{(s)} + 2CO_{(g)}   \ \delta H = -38.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (5)

2Fe_3O_4_{(s)} +CO_{2(g)} \to     3FeO_3_{(s)}+CO_{(g)}   \  \ \delta H = 47.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (6)

3 Fe_2O_3_{(s)} +9CO_{(g)} \to 6FE_{(s)} + 9CO_{2(g)}  \ \ \delta H = -75.0 \ kJ/mole  -- equation (7)

<u>                                                                                                                      </u>

FeO  \ \ \ +  \ \ \ CO   \ \  \to   \ \ \ \ Fe_{(s)} + \ \ CO_{2(g)} \ \ \  \delta H = - 66.0 \ kJ/mole

<u>                                                                                                                     </u>

<u />

\delta H_{rxn} = \delta H_1 +  \delta H_2 +  \delta H_3    (According to Hess Law)

\delta H_{rxn} = (-38.0 +  47.0 + (-75.0)) \ kJ/mole

\delta H_{rxn} = -66.0  \ kJ/mole

8 0
3 years ago
Help Please! Thanks!
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it would be the most reasonable

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It takes much less energy to change the temperature of oil than it does to change the temperature of water
Andrew [12]

Answer:

i think so

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which diagram above has 4 valence electrons?
Gemiola [76]

Answer:

answer A has four valence electrons

Explanation:

The outer shell has 4 electrons, which are considered the valence electrons

8 0
3 years ago
The public is not yet able to purchase cars powered by hydrogen fuel cells because engineers have to determine how the cars perf
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

It’s B just did it

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Boitic factors and abiotic factors in the ecosystem
    9·1 answer
  • In which situation is no work considered to be done by a force?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the term used to describe a set of elements whose properties tend to be largely predictable based on p
    6·2 answers
  • Suppose that you have 125 mL of a buffer that is 0.140 M in both hydrofluoric acid ( HF ) and its conjugate base ( F − ) . Calcu
    5·1 answer
  • How would the energy needs of a cell be compared to the energy needs of a city ?
    14·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Which notation is used to represent gamma decay?​
    6·1 answer
  • Someone who’s good with science this is for you btw I’ll brainlist and rate 5 star due today.
    12·1 answer
  • Consider these two entries from a fictional table of standard reduction potentials.
    6·1 answer
  • Using the equations
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE:O Density is a measure of how closely packed the atoms of a substance are.O The Densi
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!