Answer:
A pet
Explanation:
Latin time I checked animals aren't made by people? I honestly don't know if this helps but I'm technically not wrong.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
becuase this is the best optimal answer when it comes to this particular situation of choice
Answer:
The inventor's claim is false in the sense that no thermal machine can violate the first thermodynamic law.
Explanation:
The inventor's claim could not be possible as no thermal machine can transfer more heat than the input work consumed. If we expose the thermal efficiency:
Where Q and W both must be in the same power unit, so we will convert the remove heat from BTU/hr to hp:
Therefore by comparing, we notice that the removing heat of 4.75 hp is large than the delivered work of 1.11 hp. By evaluating the efficiency:
[tex]n=4.75 hp / 1.1 hp = 4.3 > 1[/tex]
Answer:
The second classmate is right.
Explanation:
The height of first summit provides the potential energy it will use to climb the following ones.
Ep = m * g * h
Where
m: mass
g: acceleration of gravity
h: height
When the train goes downwards the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy (manifested as speed) and when it climbs it consumes its kinetical energy. As long as no summit is taller than the first the train should have enough energy to climb them.
Also it must be noted that friction also consumes energy, and if the track is too lomg all the energy might be consumed by it.