Hello! You can call me Emac or Eric.
I understand your problem, that question is pretty hard. But I found some information that I think you should read. This can get your problem done quickly.
Please hit that thank you button if that helped, I don’t want thank you’s I just want to know that this helped.
Please reply if this doesn’t help, I will try my best to gather more information or a answer.
Here is some good information that could help you out a lot!
Let’s begin by exploring some techniques astronomers use to study how galaxies are born and change over cosmic time. Suppose you wanted to understand how adult humans got to be the way they are. If you were very dedicated and patient, you could actually observe a sample of babies from birth, following them through childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood, and making basic measurements such as their heights, weights, and the proportional sizes of different parts of their bodies to understand how they change over time.
Unfortunately, we have no such possibility for understanding how galaxies grow and change over time: in a human lifetime—or even over the entire history of human civilization—individual galaxies change hardly at all. We need other tools than just patiently observing single galaxies in order to study and understand those long, slow changes.
We do, however, have one remarkable asset in studying galactic evolution. As we have seen, the universe itself is a kind of time machine that permits us to observe remote galaxies as they were long ago. For the closest galaxies, like the Andromeda galaxy, the time the light takes to reach us is on the order of a few hundred thousand to a few million years. Typically not much changes over times that short—individual stars in the galaxy may be born or die, but the overall structure and appearance of the galaxy will remain the same. But we have observed galaxies so far away that we are seeing them as they were when the light left them more than 10 billion years ago.
That is some information, I do have more if you need some! Thanks!
Have a great rest of your day/night! :)
Emacathy,
Brainly Team.
Answer:
a) 4.9*10^-6
b) 5.71*10^-15
Explanation:
Given
current, I = 3.8*10^-10A
Diameter, D = 2.5mm
n = 8.49*10^28
The equation for current density and speed drift is
J = I/A = (ne) Vd
A = πD²/4
A = π*0.0025²/4
A = π*6.25*10^-6/4
A = 4.9*10^-6
Now,
J = I/A
J = 3.8*10^-10/4.9*10^-6
J = 7.76*10^-5
Electron drift speed is
J = (ne) Vd
Vd = J/(ne)
Vd = 7.76*10^-5/(8.49*10^28)*(1.60*10^-19)
Vd = 7.76*10^-5/1.3584*10^10
Vd = 5.71*10^-15
Therefore, the current density and speed drift are 4.9*10^-6
And 5.71*10^-15 respectively

Maximum height
= (Usinα)^2/2g
(50*0.5)^2/20
25^2/20
625/20
=31.25metres
horizontal distance = Range= [U^2 * sin2α]/g
[50^2 * sin60]/10
2500 * 0.8660/10
2165/10=216.5metres
Start by facing East. Your first displacement is the vector
<em>d</em>₁ = (225 m) <em>i</em>
Turning 90º to the left makes you face North, and walking 350 m in this direction gives the second displacement,
<em>d</em>₂ = (350 m) <em>j</em>
Turning 30º to the right would have you making an angle of 60º North of East, so that walking 125 m gives the third displacement,
<em>d</em>₃ = (125 m) (cos(60º) <em>i</em> + sin(60º) <em>j</em> )
<em>d</em>₃ ≈ (62.5 m) <em>i</em> + (108.25 m) <em>j</em>
The net displacement is
<em>d</em> = <em>d</em>₁ + <em>d</em>₂ + <em>d</em>₃
<em>d</em> ≈ (287.5 m) <em>i</em> + (458.25 m) <em>j</em>
and its magnitude is
|| <em>d</em> || = √[ (287.5 m)² + (458.25 m)² ] ≈ 540.973 m ≈ 541 m
The acceleration of the electron is larger than the acceleration of the proton.
The reason for this is that the mass of the electron is smaller (about 1000 times smaller) than the mass of the proton. The two particles have same charge (e), so they experience the same force under the same electric field E:
However, according to Newton's second law, the force is the product between the mass particle, m, and its acceleration, a:
which can be rewritten as

we said that the force exerted on the two particles, F, is the same, while the mass of the electron is smaller: therefore, from the last formula we see that the acceleration of the electron will be larger than that of the proton.