Answer:
In an elastic collision, the total kinetic energy is conserved, while in an inelastic collision, it is not
Explanation:
Let's define the two types of collision:
- Elastic collision: an elastic collision is a collision in which:
1) the total momentum of the system is conserved
2) the total kinetic energy of the system is conserved
Typically, elastic collisions occur when there are no frictional forces acting on the objects in the system, so that no kinetic energy is lost into thermal energy. An example of elastic collision is the collision between biliard balls.
- Inelastic collision: an inelastic collision is a collision in which:
1 ) the total momentum of the system is conserved
2) the total kinetic energy of the system is NOT conserved
In an elastic collision, part of the total kinetic energy is lost (=converted into thermal energy) due to the presence of frictional forces. An example of inelastic collision is the accident between two cars, in which part of the energy is converted into heat.
Answer:
175.96 g
Explanation:
Potential energy required for the man to climb 7.07 km = m g h.
= 64 x 9.8 x 7070
= 4.434 x 10⁶ J
= 4.434 X 10⁶ / 4.2 cals
= 1.0557 x 10⁶ cals
= 1.0557 x 10⁶ / 6000 g of butter
= 175.96 g of butter.
As we know the formula of kinetic energy is

here given that
KE = 150,000 J
mass = 120 kg
we can use this to find speed



So speed of above object is 50 m/s
Answer:D. λfilm/4
Explanation: Destructive interference is a type of wave interference which means the coming together or over-lapping of two opposing waves creating No effect or the Cancellation of the wave impact. An example of destructive wave is when Noise cancel the effect of sound from a head phone.
The film thickness will need to be increased by λfilm/4 for it to be able to give a destructive interference.
The statement: "secondary evidence is the basis for drawing scientific conclusions" is definitely false. Secondary evidence is the body of information obtained to prove the existence of unknown or missing primary evidence. In drawing scientific conclusions, primary evidence is needed.