All categories

3 years ago

A small glider is coasting horizontally when suddenly a very heavy piece of cargo falls out of the bottom of the plane.

Physics

1 answer:

myrzilka [38]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

Explanation:

Just to make it clear, the question is as follows from what I understand.

A small glider is coasting horizontally when suddenly a very heavy piece of cargo falls out of the bottom of the plane. You can neglect air resistance.

Just after the cargo has fallen out:

a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

b. The cargo slows down but the plane does not change speed.

c. Neither the cargo nor the plane change speed.

d. The plane speeds up and the cargo slows down.

e. Both the cargo and the plane speed up.

And we are requested to choose the right answer under the given conditions. We know the glider has no motor, then it must be in free fall movement, then it is experiencing some force that pulls it to the from due to the gravity effect on it, and a force in general is calculated by

F=m*a, m:= mass of the object, a:= acceleration.

Here we are only considering the horizontal effect of the forces, then since the mass is reduced the acceleration must increase to compensate and maintain the equilibrium of the forces, then the glider being lighter can travel faster due to the acceleration. On the other hand by the time the cargo left the glider there was no acceleration and the speed it had at the moment he left the plane continues, then the cargo does not change its speed, then horizontally speaking the answer would be a. The plane speeds up but the cargo does not change speed.

You might be interested in

Is saliva breaking a down a piece of bread chemical or physical

Elza [17]

It's a chemical change since it cannot be reversed and the saliva releases a new substance

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Atmospheric pressure is greater at the base of a mountain than at

aliina [53]

At the top of the mountain, when he tightens the cap onto the bottole, there is some water and some air inside the bottle. Then he brings the bottle down to the base of the mountain.

The pressure on the outside of the bottle is greater than it was when he put the cap on. If anything could get out of the bottlde, it would. But it can't . . . the cap is on too tight. So all the water and all the air has to stay inside, and anything that can get squished into a smaller space has to get squished into a smaller space.

The water is pretty much unsquishable.

Biut the air in there can be <em>COMPRESSED</em>. The air gets squished into a smaller space, and the bottle wrinkles in slightly.

8 0

3 years ago

Determine the gravitational field 300km above the surface of the earth. How does this compare to the field on the earth's surfac

Serjik [45]

The strength of the gravitational field is given by:
$g= \frac{GM}{r^2}$
where
G is the gravitational constant
M is the Earth's mass
r is the distance measured from the centre of the planet.

In our problem, we are located at 300 km above the surface. Since the Earth radius is R=6370 km, the distance from the Earth's center is:
$r=R+h=6370 km+300 km=6670 km= 6.67 \cdot 10^{6} m$

And now we can use the previous equation to calculate the field strength at that altitude:
$g= \frac{GM}{r^2}= \frac{(6.67 \cdot 10^{-11} m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2})(5.97 \cdot 10^{24} kg)}{(6.67 \cdot 10^6 m)^2} = 8.95 m/s^2$

And we can see this value is a bit less than the gravitational strength at the surface, which is $g_s = 9.81 m/s^2$ .

4 0

3 years ago

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST! PLS ANSWER ASAP

Montano1993 [528]

Answer

What makes up a perfect planet? It is the right distance from the Sun, it is protected from harmful solar radiation by its magnetic field, it is kept warm by an insulating atmosphere, and it has the right chemical ingredients for life, including water and carbon. Proportionate Ozone Layer and Light amount. According to the panspermia hypothesis, microscopic life—distributed by meteoroids, asteroids and other small Solar System bodies—may exist throughout the Universe. This is the perfect planet. In the end a perfect planet includes SUSTAINBLE DEVELOPEMNT IN EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE!

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Optical astronomers need a clear, dark sky to collect good data. Explain why radio astronomers have no problem observing in the

gregori [183]

Answer:

In the clarification portion elsewhere here, the definition of the concern is mentioned.

Explanation:

So like optical telescopes capture light waves, introduce it to concentrate, enhance it, as well as make it usable through different instruments via study, so radio telescopes accumulate weak signal light waves, introduce that one to focus, enhance it, as well as make this information available during research. To research naturally produced radio illumination from stars, galaxies, dark matter, as well as other natural phenomena, we utilize telescopes.

Optical telescopes detect space-borne visible light. There are some drawbacks of optical telescopes mostly on the surface:

Mostly at night would they have been seen.
Unless the weather gets cloudy, bad, or gloomy, they shouldn't be seen.

Although radio telescopes monitor space-coming radio waves. Those other telescopes, when they are already typically very massive as well as costly, have such an improvement surrounded by optical telescopes. They should be included in poor weather and, when they travel through the surrounding air, the radio waves aren't obscured by clouds. Throughout the afternoon and also some at night, radio telescopes are sometimes used.

3 0

2 years ago