<span> answer>>>>electric force <<<<by the way i don't like physics but i answer this for you ^-^</span>
<span>This is because centripetal force is just the net force of a circular motion. There are no attractive or repulsive forces here. This is not the case here. </span>
<span>The gravitational force is a force reliant on mass and attraction of the masses. There are attractive forces here, but not really repulsive forces. </span>
<span>The electric force is the only one that would make sense because it has to do with a relationship between charges and includes both repulsive and attractive forces.</span>
Answer:
a) 5.851× 10¹⁰m/s²
b) 2.411×10⁻¹¹s
c) 1.70×10⁻¹¹m
d) 1.661×10⁻²⁷KJ
Explanation:
A proton in the field experience a downward force of magnitude,
F = eE. The force of gravity on the proton will be negligible compared to the electric force
F = eE
a= eE/m
= 1.602×10⁻¹⁹ × 610/1.67×10⁻²⁷
= 5.851× 10¹⁰m/s²
b)
V = u + at
u= 0
v= 1.4106m/s
v= (0)t + at
t= v/a
= 1.4106m/s/5.851 ×10¹⁰
= 2.411×10⁻¹¹s
c)
S = ut + at²
= (o)t + 5.851×10¹⁰×(2.411×10⁻¹¹)²
= 1.70×10⁻¹¹m
d)
Ke = 1/2mv²
= (1.67×10⁻²⁷×)(1.4106)²/2
= 1.661×10⁻²⁷KJ
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
(Mass does not affect the pendulum's swing. The longer the length of string, the farther the pendulum falls; and therefore, the longer the period, or back and forth swing of the pendulum. The greater the amplitude, or angle, the farther the pendulum falls; and therefore, the longer the period.)
Answer:
(a) 62.5 m
(b) 7.14 s
Explanation:
initial speed, u = 35 m/s
g = 9.8 m/s^2
(a) Let the rocket raises upto height h and at maximum height the speed is zero.
Use third equation of motion
h = 62.5 m
Thus, the rocket goes upto a height of 62.5 m.
(b) Let the rocket takes time t to reach to maximum height.
By use of first equation of motion
v = u + at
0 = 35 - 9.8 t
t = 3.57 s
The total time spent by the rocket in air = 2 t = 2 x 3.57 = 7.14 second.
