Answer:
False
Explanation:
Let's consider the definition of the angular momentum,
where 
is the moment of inertia for a rigid body. Now, this moment of inertia could change if we change the axis of rotation, because "r" is defined as the distance between the puntual mass and the nearest point on the axis of rotation, but still it's going to have some value. On the other hand,
so 
unless 
║ 
.
In conclusion, a rigid body could rotate about certain axis, generating an angular momentum, but if you choose another axis, there could be some parts of the rigid body rotating around the new axis, especially if there is a projection of the old axis in the new one.
The moment of inertia is the rotational analog of mass, and it is given by
the product of mass and the square of the distance from the axis.
- The moment of inertia changes as the position of the weight is changed, which indicates that; statement is incorrect
Reasons:
The weight on each arm that have adjustable positions can be considered as point masses.
The moment of inertia of a point mass is <em>I</em> = m·r²
Where;
m = The mass of the weight
r = The distance (position) from the center to which the weight is adjusted
Therefore;
The moment of inertia, <em>I </em>∝ r²
Which gives;
Doubling the distance from the center of rotation, increases the moment of inertia by factor of 4.
Therefore, the statement contradicts the relationship between the radius of rotation and moment of inertia.
Learn more about moment of inertia here:
brainly.com/question/4454769
It'd be an unbalanced force
No.
Since repeated measurements are taken and the average and 95% confidence interval are calculated, the possibility of the lack of agreement being a random error has been minimized or even eliminated.
<h3>What is a random error?</h3>
Random error is defined as the deviation of the total error from its mean value due to chance.
Random errors can result from the instrument not being precise or from mistakes by the researcher.
Random errors can be minimized by taking multiple readings and averaging the results.
Since repeated measurements are taken and the average and 95% confidence interval are calculated, the possibility of the lack of agreement being a ransom error has been minimized.
Learn more about random errors at: brainly.com/question/22041172
