Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx
High energy waves have Gamma rays
Answer:
When did humans learn that the Earth is not the center of the universe?
Answer
1
Follow
Request
More
Ad by Odoo
Odoo: The open-source CRM!
Keep track of leads and opportunities, personalize sales cycles, and control forecasts with Odoo CRM!
Learn More
4 Answers
Asked in 3 Spaces


Science - Next Generation
Alexander Somm
, Consultant, Investor Relations at Novelpharm AG (2015-present)
Answered Oct 16
What, it isn’t?!
Sorry, I had to.
As far as I have read and understood, the Sumerians and later the Babylonians both had astronomical calendars that already differentiated planets and stars. Earth was not the center to them, the Sun likely was. That was around 2,200 - 1,600 BC.
After that, Greek philosopher Aristarchus of Samos (310 - 230 BC) was the first (recorded) to have believed the solar system was organized around the Sun, rather than the Earth. His heliocentric model was unpopular during Aristarchus’ lifetime, although it would inspire astronomers centuries later, such as Copernicus and Galileo.
Now, there are numerous archeological findings (cave paintings) and studies, that all suggest an understanding of complex astronomy in prehistoric times dating back as far as 40,000 years. This also explains how early, prehistoric migrants may have navigated the seas.
Explanation:
hope it helps
have a good day
I think it’s C b/c it works for me
Answer:
Explanation:
Electric field between plates of a parallel plate capacitor is uniform .
In a uniform electric field , relation between electric field and potential gradient is as follows
electric field = potential gradient [ E = - dV / dl ]
in the given case ,
dV = 51 V ,
dl = 4 cm
= 4 x 10⁻² m
E = 51 / 4 x 10⁻²
= 12.75 x 10² V / m
= 1275 V / m
