Wouldn't it be neat if an electron falling closer to the nucleus ... emitting a
photon ... actually gave out more energy than it needed to climb to its original
energy level by absorbing a photon ! If there were some miraculous substance
that could do that, we'd have it made.
All we'd need is a pile of it in our basement, with a bright light bulb over the pile,
connected to a tiny hand-crank generator.
Whenever we wanted some energy, like for cooking or heating the house, we'd
switch the light bulb on, point it towards the pile, and give the little generator a
little shove. It wouldn't take much to git 'er going.
The atoms in the pile would absorb some photons, raising their electrons to higher
energy levels. Then the electrons would fall back down to lower energy levels,
releasing more energy than they needed to climb up. We could take that energy,
use some of it to keep the light bulb shining on the pile, and use the extra to heat
the house or run the dishwasher.
The energy an electron absorbs when it climbs to a higher energy level (forming
the atom's absorption spectrum) is precisely identical to the energy it emits when
it falls back to its original level (creating the atom's emission spectrum).
Energy that wasn't either there in the atom to begin with or else pumped
into it from somewhere can't be created there.
You get what you pay for, or, as my grandfather used to say, "For nothing
you get nothing."
We use the equation of motion for vertical component,

Here,
is displacement of bullet,
is vertical initial velocity of bullet which is equal to zero because bullet was fired horizontally, and t is time of flight.
Therefore,

Given, 
Substituting the values, we get time of flight

Answer:
How does sperm cells get out of the genitals of the male's? What produces the sperms? Why does women have to hope on the genitals?
kjd;oisdnvliusdh;j;ovh;dfkn'grGXC/?jd;.d
sgo]er]'gr'kspdzg'
er
dg
rd
h'
d/h
'dfhdf
t'
Explanation:
Answer:
The north pole has the strongest magnetic force
Answer:
i. + 22.5 m ii. 4.0 m
Explanation:
i. Image distance
Using the lens formula
1/u + 1/v = 1/f where f = focal length = + 18.0 m, u = object distance = distance of shark away from lens = + 90.0 m and v = image distance from lens = unknown
So, we find v
1/v = 1/f - 1/u
= 1/+18 - 1/+90
= (5 - 1)/90
= 4/90
v = 90/4
= + 22.5 m
So the image is real and formed 22.5 m away on the other side of the lens.
ii Length of Shark
Using the magnification formula, m = image height/object height = image distance/object distance. image height = 1.0 m where object height = length of shark.
m = image distance/object distance
= v/u
= +22.5/+90
= 0.25
0.25 = image height/object height
So,
object height = image height/0.25
= 1.0 m/0.25
= 4.0 m
So, the length of the shark is 4.0 m