Answer:
The correct option is;
Fluid power systems are much more efficient with regards to energy costs and overall cost savings
Explanation:
The option that will provide a valid reason for the larger proportion of the consumers to change to the fluid power trucks from the diesel powered trucks is the possibility of increased efficiency in the cost of energy, and the cost savings to be made from making the switch to the fluid power trucks, due to the lower input required and the faster rate at which the consumer budget will be rebalanced leading to increased return on investment and improved rate of return.
Https://www.slader.com/discussion/question/an-insulated-rigid-tank-is-divided-into-two-equal-parts-by-a-partition-initially-one-part-contains-4/
there will be the answer
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Single Unit Truck ESAL = 43.38 + 5.16 = 48.54
Semi Unit Truck ESAL = 43.38+ 6.00+7.4 = 56.78
So total ESAL's during design life = (400*48.54 + 350*56.78)*365*10/18000 = (19416+19873)*3650= 3939
Kindly check the attached image
Here
Reliability = 95% = 0.95, therefore ZR = -1.645, S0 = 0.4, MR = 18
Delta PSI = 4.2-2.5= 1.7
Resilient Modulus = 18000 psi, So MR = 18
Assume SN = 3.0 for flexible pavements
There W18 calculates to 0.26807
So
log10 (3939) = 9.36*log10(SN+1) -.2/(.4+1094/(SN+1)5.19)) -6.01
Structural Number SN = a1*d1 + a2*d2 *m2 +a2*d3 *m3
= a1*d1 + a2*d2 +a2*d3
The all purpose one will work or you could use type C I believe.