The compound HClO4, when placed in water, will dissociate into the ions, H+ and ClO4-. Therefore, the 2.0 M solution will also form 2.0 M H+. The pH is calculated through the equation,
pH = -log[H+]
Substituting,
pH = -log[2] = -0.3
Thus, the pH of the solution is -0.3.
They can use the properties to test and come to some kind of conslusion about the object because in some way it's gotta correlate back to one of the different properties of matter.
Answer:
D) SrCO3(s) + 2 HNO2(aq) → Sr(NO2)2 + H2O + CO2(g)
Explanation:
When an acid react with carbonate, it produces nitrate, carbon-dioxide gas and water molecule. When nitrous acid react with Strontium carbonate, three products are formed i. e. Strontium nitrate, carbon-dioxide gas and water. In the reaction, both nitrous acid and Strontium carbonate exchange their partners with each other and forming a different products.
Answer:
222.30 L
Explanation:
We'll begin by calculating the number of mole in 100 g of ammonia (NH₃). This can be obtained as follow:
Mass of NH₃ = 100 g
Molar mass of NH₃ = 14 + (3×1)
= 14 + 3
= 17 g/mol
Mole of NH₃ =?
Mole = mass /molar mass
Mole of NH₃ = 100 / 17
Mole of NH₃ = 5.88 moles
Next, we shall determine the number of mole of Hydrogen needed to produce 5.88 moles of NH₃. This can be obtained as follow:
N₂ + 3H₂ —> 2NH₃
From the balanced equation above,
3 moles of H₂ reacted to produce 2 moles NH₃.
Therefore, Xmol of H₂ is required to p 5.88 moles of NH₃ i.e
Xmol of H₂ = (3 × 5.88)/2
Xmol of H₂ = 8.82 moles
Finally, we shall determine the volume (in litre) of Hydrogen needed to produce 100 g (i.e 5.88 moles) of NH₃. This can be obtained as follow:
Pressure (P) = 95 KPa
Temperature (T) = 15 °C = 15 + 273 = 288 K
Number of mole of H₂ (n) = 8.82 moles
Gas constant (R) = 8.314 KPa.L/Kmol
Volume (V) =?
PV = nRT
95 × V = 8.82 × 8.314 × 288
95 × V = 21118.89024
Divide both side by 95
V = 21118.89024 / 95
V = 222.30 L
Thus the volume of Hydrogen needed for the reaction is 222.30 L
Answer:
most likely that (2) the replicated experiment was performed incorrectly.
Why, u ask? u dare question me:
1- The initial experiment invalidness cannot be proven.
2- <em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>t</u></em>
3- Different labaratories does not effect the outcome, as long as the parameter and environment of the replicated experiment is the same as when the initial experiment was conducted.
4- Already knowing the data and errors would increase the precision of the replicated experiment.
5- Change in variables should still be in the objective (or purpose) of the experiment, thus, major difference in the outcome should not happen.
happy learning!
