Ask question

Ask question

All categories

zloy xaker [14]

2 years ago

12

A storm cloud has an electric charge of (2.1400x10^1) C near the top of the cloud and (2.99x10^1) C near the bottom of the cloud

. The magnitude of the electrostatic force between these two charges is (3.390x10^8) N. How tall is the cloud?

1 answer:

blagie [28]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

hey

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A tennis ball is dropped from 1.3 m above

Dominik [7]

Answer:

2.65m/s

Explanation:

Using the equation of motion:

v² = u²+2a∆S where

v is the final velocity

u is the initial velocity

∆S is the change in distance

a is the acceleration

Given

u = 0m/s

a = 9.8m/s²

∆S = 1.3-0.943

∆S = 0.357m

Substituting the given parameters into the formula

v² = 0²+2(9.8)(0.357)

v² = 0+6.9972

v² = 6.9972

v=√6.9972

v = 2.65m/s

Hence the velocity at which it hit the ground is 2.65m/s

4 0

3 years ago

Write the factors of potential energy

IgorLugansk [536]

It depends on two factors height and mass

6 0

2 years ago

Ignoring air resistance and the little friction from the plastic tube, the magnet was a freely-falling object in each trial. If

horsena [70]

Answer:

emf will also be 10 times less as compared to when it has fallen $40 \mathrm{m}$

Explanation:

We know, from faraday's law-

$e m f=-N \frac{\Delta \Phi}{\Delta T}$

and $\Phi=B . A$

So, as the height increases the velocity with which it will cross the ring will also increase. $(v=\sqrt{2 g h})$

Given

$\mathrm{V} 1(\text { Speed at } 40 \mathrm{m})=2 \mathrm{x} \mathrm{V} 2(\text { speed at } 10 \mathrm{m})$

$\sqrt{2 g h_{2}}=2 \times \sqrt{2 g h_{1}}=28.28 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}$

Now, from $40 \mathrm{cm}$

$V_{3}=\sqrt{2 g h_{3}}=\sqrt{2 \times 10 \times 0.4}=2.82 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}$

From equation a and b we see that velocity when dropped from $40 \mathrm{m}$ is 10 times greater when height is 40 $\mathrm{cm}$ so, emf will also be 10 times less as compared to when it has fallen $40 \mathrm{m}$

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a false statement about dispersion forces? View Available Hint(s) Which of the following is a false st

icang [17]

Explanation :

Dispersion forces are also known as London dispersion forces. It is the weakest force. Also, it is the part of the Van der Waals forces.

(1) This force is exhibited by all atoms and molecules.

(2) These forces are the result of the fluctuations in the electron distribution within molecules or atoms. Due to these fluctuations, the electric field is created. The magnitude of this force is explained in terms of Hamaker constant 'A'.

(3) Dispersion forces result from the formation of instantaneous dipoles in a molecule or atom. When electrons are more concentrated in a place, instantaneous dipoles formed.

(4) Dispersion force magnitude depends on the amount of surface area available for interactions. If the area increases, the size of the atom also increase. As a result, stronger dispersion forces.

So, the false statement is "Dispersion forces always have a greater magnitude in molecules with a greater molar mass".

4 0

3 years ago

Mechanical energy is conserved in the presence of which of the following types of forces?magnetic

Tju [1.3M]

<h2>Answer: electrostatic and gravitational force </h2><h2 />

Mechanical energy remains constant (conserved) if only <u>conservative forces</u> act on the particles.

In this sense, the following forces are conservative:

-Gravitational

-Elastic

-Electrostatics

While the Friction Force and the Magnetic Force are not conservative.

According to this, mechanical energy is conserved in the presence of electrostatic and gravitational forces.

7 0

3 years ago