Answer:
Explanation:
From the given information:
The concentration of metal ions are:
![[Ca^{2+}]= \dfrac{0.003474 \ M \times 20.49 \ mL}{10.0 \ mL}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B0.003474%20%5C%20M%20%5Ctimes%2020.49%20%5C%20mL%7D%7B10.0%20%5C%20mL%7D)
![[Ca^{2+}]=0.007118 \ M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BCa%5E%7B2%2B%7D%5D%3D0.007118%20%5C%20M)
![[Mg^2+] = \dfrac{0.003474 \ M\times (26.23 - 20.49 )mL}{10.0 \ mL}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BMg%5E2%2B%5D%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B0.003474%20%5C%20M%5Ctimes%20%2826.23%20%20-%2020.49%20%29mL%7D%7B10.0%20%5C%20mL%7D)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49e82/49e8202aa698b7901580bb8311adc9c94b090158" alt="=0.001994 \ M"
Mass of Ca²⁺ in 2.00 L urine sample is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c22ce/c22cefde530e0c69b150215929fd871802ea7432" alt="= 2.00 L \times 0.001994 \dfrac{mol}{L} \times \dfrac{40.08 \ g}{1 \ mol}"
= 0.1598 g
Mass of Ca²⁺ = 159.0 mg
Mass of Mg²⁺ in 2.00 L urine sample is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33ed5/33ed5d2e83620f7439896d49483a942f333f0127" alt="= 2.00 L \times 0.007118 \dfrac{mol}{L} \times \dfrac{24.31 \ g}{1 \ mol}"
= 0.3461 g
Mass of Mg²⁺ = 346.1 mg
<span>C4H4
The compound in question has an equal ratio of hydrogen and carbon. The atomic weight of carbon is roughly 12 and the atomic weight of hydrogen is roughly 1. The mass of the compound in question is roughly 52.
52/13=4
C4H4</span>
Hihi!
During Rutherford's experiment<span> of shooting particles through a sheet of </span>gold foil <span>he had discovered that some were deflected! This had proved that an </span>atom<span> is actually a small dense nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons!
I hope I helped!
-Loliarual</span>
Answer:
Hailey should add, they are inexpensive to produce.
Explanation:
Reason being why they are inexpensive to produce, is due to them being chemical based and easy to product in the factory setting. Which makes them extremely cheap to make.
Reason being why the others are wrong, synthetic polymers are <u>not</u> biodegradable as they are made in a factory with oils. Synthetic polymers are <u>not</u> flexible due to them being used for harder products. Synthetic polymers are <u>not</u> recycled cheaply as they are made with chemicals which makes it very hard to recycle.