1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreyandreev [35.5K]
3 years ago
12

The frequency of sound is 200 Hz. What does it mean? Please help me​

Physics
1 answer:
Norma-Jean [14]3 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

A wave having a frequency of 200 Hz means that 200 such waves pass through a point per second.

You might be interested in
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
An object is dropped from rest.
sesenic [268]

Taha xain malai ..........hhdd

3 0
3 years ago
What is a satellite
g100num [7]

Answer:

an artificial body placed in orbit around the earth or moon or another planet in order to collect information or for communication.

Explanation:

Look it up on google

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A heat engine uses thermal energy that flows from a heat source with a temperature of 325 K to a cold sink, which has a temperat
Ilya [14]
The answer is "58.5"
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At locations A and B, the electric potential has the values VA = 1.83 V and VB = 5.17 V, respectively. A proton released from re
densk [106]

Answer:

a. It starts at point B.

vp = 2.53*10⁴ m/s

a. it starts at point A.

ve= 1.08*10⁶ m/s

Explanation:

a)  As the proton is a positive charge, when released from rest, it will be accelerated due to the potential difference, from the higher potential to the lower one, so it is at the point B when released.

Once released, as the total energy must be conserved, the increase in kinetic energy must be equal (in magnitude) to the change in the electric potential energy, as follows:

ΔK + ΔUe = 0 ⇒ ΔK = -ΔUe =- (e*ΔV)

⇒ -( e* (VA-VB) ) = \frac{1}{2}*mp*v^{2}

where e= elementary charge= 1.6*10⁻¹⁹ C,  VA = 1.83 V, VB= 5.17V, and mp= mass of proton = 1.67*10⁻²⁷ kg.

Replacing by these values, and solving for v, we have:

v = \sqrt{\frac{2*1.6e-19C*3.34 V}{1.67e-27kg} } = 2.53e4 m/s

⇒ vp = 2.53*10⁴ m/s

b) If, instead of a proton, the charge realeased from rest, had been an electron, a few things would change:

First, as the electrons carry negative charges, they move from the lower potentials to the higher ones, which means that it would have started at point A.

Second, as its charge is (-e) the change in electric potential energy had been negative also:

ΔUe = -e*ΔV = -e* (VB-VA)

In order to find the speed of the electron when it is just passing point B, we can apply the conservation of energy principle as for the proton, as follows:

-( (-e)* (VB-VA) ) = \frac{1}{2}*me*v^{2}

where e= elementary charge= 1.6*10⁻¹⁹ C,  VA = 1.83 V, VB= 5.17V, and me= mass of electron = 9.1*10⁻³¹ kg.

Replacing by these values, and solving for v, we have:

v = \sqrt{\frac{2*1.6e-19C*3.34 V}{9.1e-31kg} } = 1.08e6 m/s

⇒ ve = 1.08*10⁶ m/s

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Over a period of more than 30 years, albert klein of california drove 2.5 × 106 km in one automobile. consider two charges, q1 =
    5·1 answer
  • A locomotive moved 18.0 m [W] in a time of 6.00 s and stopped. After stopping, the locomotive moved 12.0 m [E] in 10.0 s. a. Det
    13·1 answer
  • The gravity model predicts that the optimal location of a service is
    15·1 answer
  • Two electric motors drive two elevators of equal mass in a three-story building 10 meters tall. Each elevator has a mass of 1,00
    7·1 answer
  • I want to answer these questions about vectors
    13·1 answer
  • A 2190 kg car moving east at 10.5 m/s collides with a 3220 kg car moving east. The cars stick together and move east as a unit a
    6·1 answer
  • A cheetah ran 300 feet in 2.92 seconds. What was the cheetah’s average speed in miles per hour?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements uses a connotative word to evoke the most negative feeling?
    13·2 answers
  • Please help. Explain why it is correct. I will give brainliest
    7·1 answer
  • Rachel and Sarah are on a bus travelling at 5 mph past John who is standing on the sidewalk. Rachel then throws a ball
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!