Método de Programación lineal utilizado para resolver problemas en teoría de redes?

A reversible refrigeration cycle operates between cold and hot reservoirs at temperatures TC and TH, respectively. (a) If the co

podryga [215]

Answer:

a) $T_{H} = 1.967\,^{\circ}F$ , b) $COP_{R} = 9.105$ , c) $T_{H} = 115.934\,^{\circ}F$ , d) $COP_{R} = 6.995$ , e) $T_{H} = 25.129\,^{\circ}C$

Explanation:

a) The coefficient of performance of the reversible refrigeration cycle is:

$COP_{R} = \frac{T_{C}}{T_{H}-T_{C}}$

$10 = \frac{419.67\,R}{T_{H}-419.67\,R}$

The temperature of the hot reservoir is:

$10\cdot T_{H} - 4196.7 = 419.67$

$T_{H} = 461.637\,R$

$T_{H} = 1.967\,^{\circ}F$

b) The coefficient of performance is:

$COP_{R} = \frac{273.15\,K}{303.15\,K-273.15\,K}$

$COP_{R} = 9.105$

c) The temperature of the hot reservoir can be determined with the help of the following relation:

$\frac{Q_{C}}{Q_{H}-Q_{C}} = \frac{T_{C}}{T_{H}-T_{C}}$

$\frac{500\,BTU}{600\,BTU-500\,BTU} = \frac{479.67\,R}{T_{H}-479.67\,R}$

$5 = \frac{479.67\,R}{T_{H}-479.67\,R}$

$5\cdot T_{H} - 2398.35 = 479.67$

$T_{H} = 575.604\,R$

$T_{H} = 115.934\,^{\circ}F$

d) The coefficient of performance is:

$COP_{R} = \frac{489.67\,R}{559.67\,R-489.67\,R}$

$COP_{R} = 6.995$

e) The temperature of the cold reservoir is:

$8.9 = \frac{268.15\,K}{T_{H}-268.15\,K}$

$8.9\cdot T_{H} - 2386.535 = 268.15$

$T_{H} = 298.279\,K$

$T_{H} = 25.129\,^{\circ}C$

8 0

3 years ago

What is the hardest part of engineering?

Vikki [24]

ANSWER:

Aerospace Engineering. ...

Chemical Engineering. ...

Biomedical Engineering.

EXPLANATION:

This is all i know but ... I hope this helps~

7 0

2 years ago

A 0.50 m3 drum was filled with 0.49 m3 of liquid water at 25oC and the remaining volume was water vapor without any air. The dru

timurjin [86]

Answer:

There is not going to be pressure build up in the system,that is isobaric process.

Explanation:

Assumptions to be made

1. No mass is gained or lost during the heating process.

2. There are no friction losses,so work is transmitted efficiently.

3. It was started the water in the drum and its surrounding have same temperature.

4. This system is closed,so there is no mass transfer across its boundaries.

5 0

3 years ago

A pitfall cited in Section 1.10 is expecting to improve the overall performance of a computer by improving only one aspect of th

Oxana [17]

Answer:

a) For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

b) For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

c) A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

Explanation:

From the info given we know that a computer running a program that requires 250 s, with 70 s spent executing FP instructions, 85 s executed L/S instructions and 40 s spent executing branch instructions.

Part 1

For this case the new time to run the FP operation would be reduced 20% so that means 100-20% =80% from the original time

$(1-0.2)*70 s =56s$

The reduction on this case is $70-56 s=14s$

And since the new total time would be given by $250-14=236 s$

Part 2

For this case the total time is reduced 20% so that means that the new total time would be (1-0.2)=0.8 times the original total time $(1-0.2) *250s =200 s$

The original time for INT operations is calculated as:

$250 = 70+85+40 +t_{INT}$

$t_{INT}=55s$

For this part the only time that was changed is assumed the INT operations so then:

$200 = 70+85+40 \Delta t_{INT}$

And then: $\Delta t_{INT}= 200-70-85-40=5 s$

And we can quantify the decrease using the relative change:

$\% Change = \frac{5s}{55 s} *100 = 9.09\%$ of reduction

Part 3

A reduction of the total time implies that the total time would be 205 s from the results above. And the time for FP is 70, for L/S is 85 and for INT operations is 55 s, so then if we add 70+85+55=210s, we see that 210>205 so then we cannot reduce the total time 20% just reducing the branch intructions.

8 0

3 years ago

Solar energy stored in large bodies of water, called solar ponds, is being used to generate electricity. If such a solar power p

fgiga [73]

Answer: 1.137*10^7 Btu/h.

Explanation:

Given data:

Efficiency of the plant = 4.5percent

Net power output of the plant = 150kw

Solution:

The required collection rate

QH = W/n

= 150/0.045 * 0.94782/ 1 /60 */60 Btu/h.

= 3333.333 *3412.152Btu/h.

= 11373840 Btu/h

= 1.137*10^7 Btu/h.

3 0

2 years ago