Answer:
C) 7.35*10⁶ N/C radially outward
Explanation:
- If we apply the Gauss'law, to a spherical gaussian surface with radius r=7 cm, due to the symmetry, the electric field must be normal to the surface, and equal at all points along it.
- So, we can write the following equation:

- As the electric field must be zero inside the conducting spherical shell, this means that the charge enclosed by a spherical gaussian surface of a radius between 4 and 5 cm, must be zero too.
- So, the +8 μC charge of the solid conducting sphere of radius 2cm, must be compensated by an equal and opposite charge on the inner surface of the conducting shell of total charge -4 μC.
- So, on the outer surface of the shell there must be a charge that be the difference between them:

- Replacing in (1) A = 4*π*ε₀, and Qenc = +4 μC, we can find the value of E, as follows:

- As the charge that produces this electric field is positive, and the electric field has the same direction as the one taken by a positive test charge under the influence of this field, the direction of the field is radially outward, away from the positive charge.
Answer: Point A is the answer for the potential energy. Point D is the answer for the kinetic energy.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Let that point be at a distance x from q1
Then Kq1/x^2= Kq2/ (s-x)^2
Taking square roots and simplifying, x =s /[1+(q2/q1)^0.5]
Assuming an identical distance, the rigidity of Q on 2Q is equivalent in value to the rigidity of 2Q on Q. for that reason, had the area R been stored an identical, the two forces could be equivalent. inspite of the shown fact that, via fact the area is being decreased, we could constantly consult with the equation we use to calculate those forces: F = ok(Q1xQ2)/(R^2) because R is squared and is being halved, the final result's that's it being divided by potential of a million/4. for that reason, the rigidity would be expanded by potential of four, and be 4F.
I believe the answer is A.
Hope This Helps! Have A Nice Day!!