Answer:
This is false.
Explanation:
Heat rash develops when some of your sweat ducts clog. Instead of evaporating, perspiration gets trapped beneath the skin, causing inflammation and rash. Heat rash is usually self-limited, meaning it resolves on its own without treatment. Over-the-counter treatments such as calamine, hydrocortisone cream, itch preparations (such as Benadryl spray), or sunburn lotions can be used as skincare to treat the itching and burning symptoms. Heat rash usually goes away on its own within three or four days so long as you don't irritate the site further. Heat rash happens when the sweat glands get blocked. The trapped sweat irritates the skin and leads to small bumps.
Dominoes does because when you hit one, it knocks over the next one, and so on, so forth. The same type of pattern happens in a wave.
Answer:
16
Explanation:
Mechanical advantage = force out / force in
MA = 2000 N / 125 N
MA = 16
As we know that electrostatic force is a conservative force
so we can say by the condition of conservative force

here we can rearrange the above equation as

now integrate both sides

Now we know by the definition of work done by a force is given by

now work done by conservative force is given as

Now from above work done by electric field to move charge from one point to other is given as

so here work done is given as

so change in potential energy is given by work done
To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the kinematic equations of linear and angular motion, as well as the given definitions of the period.
Centripetal acceleration can be found through the relationship

Where
v = Tangential Velocity
R = Radius
At the same time linear velocity can be expressed in terms of angular velocity as

Where,
R = Radius
Angular Velocity
PART A) From this point on, we can use the values used for the period given in the exercise because the angular velocity by definition is described as

T = Period
So replacing we have to

Since 
Then the radius in meters would be


Then the centripetal acceleration would be

From the result obtained, considering that it is an unimaginably low value of an order of less than
it is possible to conclude that it supports the assertion on the inertial reference frame.