In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
The answer is SiO2
Explanation:
Silocon dioxide is written without a 1 after the silocon and with a 2 after the oxygen.
Answer: srs with 32.38 grams
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
given that, enthalpy is a state function, that means it depends only on the initial and final states, there is no difference between the enthalpy of a phase transition versus the enthalpy of a heating or cooling process, when the cooling or heating process finish in a change of phase.
It does not matter which way we take to cool or heat the substances the Enthalpy of this process will be the same.
Maximum number of electrons in nth energy level
Now
Max electrons
