No. Mechanical energy is not conserved. There's quite a bit of friction on the slide. So some of the potential energy is lost to heat on the way down, and the child arrives at the bottom with hot pants and less kinetic energy than you might expect.
Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.
Our year would now be 2.8 times longer, we would also be receiving only 1/4 of the energy from the sun that we currently do. This means that we’d now be out beyond the orbit of Mars and right at the edge of the asteroid belt, and things would rapidly get very cold with temperatures expected to drop by around 50 degrees Celsius on average, and that’s with our current atmospheric composition which would not be stable in the new conditions. And also, any living thing on earth would die.
<h2>
The asteroid is 4.11 x 10¹¹ m far from Sun</h2>
Explanation:
We have gravitational force

Where G = 6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ N m²/kg²
M = Mass of body 1
M = Mass of body 2
r = Distance between them
Here we have
M = Mass of Sun = 1.99×10³⁰ kg
m = Mass of asteroid = 4.00×10¹⁶ kg
F = 3.14×10¹³ N
Substituting

The asteroid is 4.11 x 10¹¹ m far from Sun