Most geologists accept radiometric dating techniques as valid because radioactive elements decay at a constant and measurable rate.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Scientists prefer radioactive dating to carbon dating because it is more accurate in measuring. The analysis depends upon the radioactive decay of radioactive isotopes of any matter in a given rock or soil.
The parent atoms and daughter atoms are compared while studying, and hence age can be calculated easily. Radioactive decay depends upon the given half-life of the atom, which is a constant and is known. So, it would be very easy to calculate the number of progeny atoms and parent atoms and find out their age.
For this case we first think that the skateboard and the child are one body.
We have then:
1 = jug
2 = skateboard + boy
By conservation of the linear amount of movement:
M1V1i + M2V2i = M1V1f + M2V2f
Initial rest:
v1i = v2i = 0
0 = M1V1f + M2V2f
Substituting values
0 = (7.8) (3.2) + (M2) (- 0.65)
0 = 24.96 + M2 (-0.65)
-24.96 = (-0.65) M2
M2 = (-24.96) / (- 0.65) = 38.4 kg
Then, the child's mass is:
M2 = Mskateboard + Mb
Clearing:
Mb = M2-Mskateboard
Mb = 38.4 - 1.9
Mb = 36.5 Kg
answer:
the boy's mass is 36.5 Kg
Answer:
Explanation:
Near point = 56 cm .
near point of healthy person = 25 cm
person suffers from long sightedness
convex lens will be required .
object distance u = 25 cm
image distance v = 56 cm
both will be negative as both are in front of the lens.
lens formula
I/v - 1 / u = 1/f
- 1/56 +1/25 = 1/f
- .01785 + .04 = 1/f
1/f = .02215
f = 45.15 cm .
It's is True that your body temperature your body converts chemical potential energy into thermal energy
I believe the answer is D, only a small part of it
