Answer:
All the observers are correct.
Explanation:
This is simply a problem of reference frames from which the motion of the book is being viewed by the various observers.
From their various reference frames, they are all correct.
Observer A must be in the inertial reference frame.
<em>Observers who can explain the behavior of the book and the car by using the relationship between the sum of the forces and changing velocity are said to be observers in inertial reference frames.</em>
This is clearly shown by what observer A noticed. There was a relative motion between the book and the car as she pointed out, making her to be in an inertial reference frame.
<em>Similarly, observers in inertial reference frames can also explain the changes in velocity of objects by considering the forces exerted on them by other objects.</em>
This is shown by observer B as he is able to notice how the force of the car affects the velocity of the book.
Observer C is actually in a non-inertial reference frame, as newtons law of force motion relationship are no longer observed. This occurs in the non inertial reference frame.
Answer:
a - As long as the time between 2 events is reconcilable with a light signal, the time between the events, in that frame, can be determined.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given that,
The initial speed of a car, u = 0
Time, t = 18 s
Distance, d = 390 m
We need to find the acceleration of the car. Let it is a. Using the second equation of motion to find it.
or
So, the acceleration of the car is 
.
That's "<em><u>insolation</u></em>" ... not "insulation".
'Insolation' is simply the intensity of solar radiation over some area.
If 200 kW of radiation is shining on 300 m² of area, then the insolation is
(200 kW) / (300 m²) = <em>(666 and 2/3) watt/m²</em> .
Note that this is the intensity of the <em><u>incident</u></em> radiation. It doesn't say anything
about how much soaks in or how much bounces off.
Wait !
I just looked back at the choices, and realized that I didn't answer the question
at all. I have no idea what "1 sun" means. Forgive me. I have stolen your
points, and I am filled with remorse.
Wait again !
I found it, through literally several seconds of online research.
1 sun = 1 kW/m².
So 2/3 of a kW per m² = 2/3 of 1 sun
That's between 0.5 sun and 1.0 sun.
I feel better now, and plus, I learned something.
In a closed system, energy in form of heat (work) can be exchanged but not matter.
The answer to your question is C.
Hope it helped!
