<h2>
<u>How</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>solve</u><u>?</u></h2>
We know that, Velocity is the rate of displacement covered. Displacement is the shortest path between the Initial and Final point covered by the body. So,
- Velocity = Displacement / Time
And, when it comes to Average velocity, It is the total displacement by total time taken. So, By using this let's solve this question.....
<h2>
<u>Solution</u><u>:</u></h2>
✏️ Refer to the attachment...
Let the body goes to point A that is 7 m East of the Initial point. Then it comes backward because West is opposite to East in perpendicular direction. It covers 1.5 m backwards in the same line to reach B which is the Final point.
So,
- Displacement = Final point - Initial point
⇛ Displacement = 7 m - 1.5 m
⇛ Displacement = 5.5 m
Total time taken,
⇛ 2 hours + 1 hour
⇛ 3 hours
Finding Average displacement,
⇛ Total displacement / Total time taken
⇛ 5.5 m / 3 hours
⇛ 1.83333.... hours
So, the Final answer is,
<u>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━</u>
Answer: the correct one is E .systems; for example, hurricanes could be prevented from forming by artificial "reefs" of precisely shaped marine platforms
Explanation:
(A) The portion after the semi-colon (for instance, ... platforms) is not a complete sentence.
(B) The portion after the semi-colon (for example, ... forming) is not a complete sentence.
(C) Which ... "reefs" ... prevent forming is unidiomatic; from is needed between prevent and forming. Prevent appears in the present tense, illogically implying that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—already prevent the formation of hurricanes.
(D) The construction such as artificial "reefs" illogically implies that artificial reefs are weather systems. Additionally, the use of can in the present tense (as opposed to could) illogically implies that the artificial reefs—which don't yet exist, according to the earlier part of the sentence—do already exist.
(E) CORRECT. The semicolon is properly used to separate two complete sentences. Could is correctly used to describe a hypothetical consequence.
Answer:
The given statement concerning distance and displacement is true.
Explanation:
If any point travels along any path between two points A and B the distance it travels is the length of the actual path it travels.
Mathematically the distance between two points is the algebraic sum of the infinitesimal distances that the particle travels.
Mathematically 
Displacement by definition is the shortest distance between the initial and final positions of the particle and is given by the straight line joining the two points.
Since a line is the shortest path that exists between 2 points thus it will be always smaller than any other path connecting the 2 points hence will be smaller than the distance.
While as if the object travels along a straight line without changing it's direction the distance in that case equals the displacement.
that would be given by
[email protected]
@ representing coefficient of kinetic friction.
thus 19.5/51.7 = 0.377
Explanation:
7) Given:
v₀ = 2.0 m/s
v = 0 m/s
t = 3.00 s
Find: Δx
Acceleration isn't included in the problem, so use a kinematic equation that doesn't involve a.
Δx = ½ (v + v₀) t
Δx = ½ (0 m/s + 2.0 m/s) (3.00 s)
Δx = 3.0 m
8) Given:
v₀ = 0 m/s
v = 5 m/s
t = 4 s
Find: a
Displacement isn't included in the problem, so use a kinematic equation that doesn't involve Δx.
v = at + v₀
5 m/s = a (4 s) + 0 m/s
a = 1.25 m/s²
9) Given:
v_avg = Δx / t
0.5 m/s = 8 m / t
t = 16 s
