Answer:
The first two options are correct
Explanation:
The first two options are part of the benefits of a parallel connection of bulbs in a circuit. Here, the voltage of each connecting bulb is the same as the voltage of the bulb in the circuit hence all the bulbs have the same voltage running through them. Thus, when one bulb is removed/burns out, it does not affect the remaining bulbs (those ones will remain lit). Also, the addition of bulb(s) does not cause the remaining bulbs in the circuit to get dimmer (since they will all have the same voltage).
Answer:
Friction and Automobile Tires. ... On dry surfaces you might get as high as 0.9 as a coefficient of friction, but driving them on wet roads would be dangerous since the wet road coefficient might be as low as 0.1
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
I don't think so
Explanation:
The equation doesn't look balanced
<span><span>When you write down the electronic configuration of bromine and sodium, you get this
Na:
Br: </span></span>
<span><span />So here we the know the valence electrons for each;</span>
<span><span>Na: (2e)
Br: (7e, you don't count for the d orbitals)
Then, once you know this, you can deduce how many bonds each can do and you discover that bromine can do one bond since he has one electron missing in his p orbital, but that weirdly, since the s orbital of sodium is full and thus, should not make any bond.
However, it is possible for sodium to come in an excited state in wich he will have sent one of its electrons on an higher shell to have this valence configuration:</span></span>
<span><span /></span><span><span>
</span>where here now it has two lonely valence electrons, one on the s and the other on the p, so that it can do a total of two bonds.</span><span>That's why bromine and sodium can form </span>
<span>
</span>
Answer:
both are same give different number
