Answer:
0.42 M
Explanation:
The reaction that takes place is:
- Cu(CH₃COO)₂ + Na₂CrO₄ → Cu(CrO₄) + 2Na(CH₃COO)
First we <u>calculate the moles of Na₂CrO₄</u>, using the <em>given volume and concentration</em>:
(200 mL = 0.200L)
- 0.70 M * 0.200 L = 0.14 moles Na₂CrO₄
Now we <u>calculate the moles of Cu(CH₃COO)₂</u>, using its <em>molar mass</em>:
- 40.8 g ÷ 181.63 g/mol = 0.224 mol Cu(CH₃COO)₂
Because the molar ratio of Cu(CH₃COO)₂ and Na₂CrO₄ is 1:1, we can directly <u>substract the reacting moles of Na₂CrO₄ from the added moles of Cu(CH₃COO)₂</u>:
- 0.224 mol - 0.14 mol = 0.085 mol
Finally we <u>calculate the resulting molarity</u> of Cu⁺², from the <em>excess </em>cations remaining:
- 0.085 mol / 0.200 L = 0.42 M
Answer:
because no 2 or 3 bond so it is saturated
The experiment that was carried out by Louisa goes to show us that different materials heat up at different rates.
<h3>What is the specific heat capacity?</h3>
The term specific heat capacity just goes to show us the amount of heat that must be absorbed before the temperature of an object would rise by 1 K. In this case, we can see that we have been told that the after 30 minutes, the sand had heated more than the water. This simply implies that the energy that the sand and the water absorbed was able to increase the temperature of the sand mush more than it increased the temperature of the water.
Thus we can see that the heat capacity of the sand is much less than the heat capacity of the water since the sand could be able to be heated up much faster than the the water could be heated up.
Learn more about heat capacity:brainly.com/question/28302909
#SPJ1
Answer:
4.77mol is the correct answer
