All categories

4 years ago

What term in physical science is defined as a change in position

Physics

1 answer:

Monica [59]4 years ago

6 0

<span>A change in position would be motion. (Motion) is the answer for A+</span>

You might be interested in

Why are light intensity, carbon dioxide concentration and temperature liimiting factors

Harman [31]

Answer:

As carbon dioxide concentrations increase, so too does the rate of photosynthesis until a certain point where the graph levels off. At lower carbon dioxide concentrations carbon dioxide is the limiting factor because an increase in carbon dioxide causes an increase in photosynthesis.

Explanation:

Hope it helps u

FOLLOW MY ACCOUNT PLS PLS

8 0

3 years ago

According to Kepler's Third Law, a solar-system planet that has an orbital radius of 4 AU would have an orbital period of about

NARA [144]

Answer:

Orbital period, T = 1.00074 years

Explanation:

It is given that,

Orbital radius of a solar system planet, $r=4\ AU=1.496\times 10^{11}\ m$

The orbital period of the planet can be calculated using third law of Kepler's. It is as follows :

$T^2=\dfrac{4\pi^2}{GM}r^3$

M is the mass of the sun

$T^2=\dfrac{4\pi^2}{6.67\times 10^{-11}\times 1.989\times 10^{30}}\times (1.496\times 10^{11})^3$

$T^2=\sqrt{9.96\times 10^{14}}\ s$

T = 31559467.6761 s

T = 1.00074 years

So, a solar-system planet that has an orbital radius of 4 AU would have an orbital period of about 1.00074 years.

6 0

3 years ago

3. How do astronomers explain the lack of a meteorite in Tunguska? What evidence exists to support this

Vaselesa [24]

No traces of a meteorite were found, it many scientists concluded that the culprit was a comet. Comets, which are essentially muddy ice balls, could cause such a devastation and leave no trace.

But now, 105 years later, scientists have revealed that the Tunguska devastation was indeed caused by a meteorite. A group of Ukrainian, German, and American scientists have identified its microscopic remains. Why it took them so many years makes for a fascinating tale about the limits of science and how we are pushing them.

4 0

3 years ago

A coil of 40 turns is wrapped around a long solenoid of cross-sectional area 7.5×10−3m2. The solenoid is 0.50 m long and has 500

defon

To solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to mutual inductance in a solenoid.

This definition is described in the following equation as,

$M = \frac{\mu_0 N_1 N_2A_1}{l_1}$

Where,

$\mu =$ permeability of free space

$N_1 =$ Number of turns in solenoid 1

$N_2 =$ Number of turns in solenoid 2

$A_1=$ Cross sectional area of solenoid

l = Length of the solenoid

Part A )

Our values are given as,

$\mu_0 = 4\pi *10^{-7}H/m$

$N_1 = 500$

$N_2 = 40$

$A = 7.5*10^{-4}m^2$

$l = 0.5m$

Substituting,

$M = \frac{\mu_0 N_1 N_2A_2}{l_1}$

$M = \frac{(4\pi *10^{-7})(500)(40)(7.5*10^{-4})}{0.5}$

$M = 3.77*10^{-4}H$

PART B) Considering that many of the variables remain unchanged in the second solenoid, such as the increase in the radius or magnetic field, we can conclude that mutual inducantia will appear the same.

8 0

4 years ago

Calculate the acceleration of a 270000-kg jumbo jet just before takeoff when the thrust on the aircraft is 160000 N .

Radda [10]

Answer:

<h3>The answer is 0.59 m/s²</h3>

Explanation:

The acceleration of an object given it's mass and the force acting on it can be found by using the formula

$a = \frac{f}{m} \\$

f is the force

m is the mass

From the question we have

$a = \frac{160000}{270000} = \frac{16}{27} \\ = 0.592592...$

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

7 0

3 years ago